Lease Extensions and Variations: Terms, Tacit Relocation, and Content Overview

How SDLT treats lease extensions, variations and tacit relocation

For SDLT, the lease term is not always limited to the dates in the original lease. If a lease is extended, varied, or carries on after its stated end date, you must look at the legal effect of what has happened to decide whether the same lease continues, a new lease has arisen, or a further SDLT charge may apply.

• SDLT on leases depends heavily on the length of the lease term, so any change to that term can affect the tax position.
• An extension or variation does not automatically mean the same lease simply continues; in some cases SDLT may treat the change as a new lease or a surrender and regrant.
• If a lease continues after expiry, the reason matters, such as continuation under the lease terms, by statute, or by tacit relocation under Scots law.
• Tacit relocation is a Scots law concept where a lease may continue automatically if neither party properly ends it.
• The SDLT analysis depends on the precise legal facts and the actual legal effect, not just the label the parties give to the arrangement.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

Lease extensions, variations and tacit relocation: how the lease term is treated for SDLT

This page explains how Stamp Duty Land Tax looks at the term of a lease where the lease is extended, varied, or continues after its original end date. The point matters because SDLT on leases depends heavily on the length of the term. If the term changes, that can affect whether a further SDLT charge arises and how the lease is analysed.

What this rule is about

For SDLT, the term of a lease is not always limited to the period written in the original lease document. A lease may later be extended, its terms may be varied, or it may continue by operation of law or under local property law rules after the contractual expiry date.

The official material identified here is a contents page dealing with lease extensions, variations, and continuation of leases, including continuation by tacit relocation. Tacit relocation is a concept most commonly associated with Scots law, where a lease may continue automatically in certain circumstances if neither party brings it to an end properly.

The underlying issue is simple: when a lease does not end cleanly on its original expiry date, you need to decide whether SDLT continues to treat the same lease as ongoing, whether there has been a new lease, or whether a variation has created a fresh chargeable event.

What the official source says

The source provided is only the heading of a manual section. It indicates that HMRC’s SDLT manual deals with the term of a lease in situations involving:

• lease extensions
• variations of leases
• leases continuing after the original term, including by tacit relocation

Although the extracted text does not set out the detailed rules, the heading shows that HMRC treats these situations as part of the wider question of determining the lease term for SDLT purposes.

What this means in practice

In practice, you should not assume that the term stated in the original lease is the end of the SDLT analysis.

If the lease is extended, the first question is whether the parties have merely changed the existing lease or whether they have effectively granted a new lease. That distinction can affect whether there is a further land transaction for SDLT.

If the lease is varied, the same issue arises. Some changes are simply changes to the existing bargain. Others may be so substantial, or may operate in a way that SDLT treats as a surrender and regrant, that a new lease analysis becomes relevant.

If the lease continues automatically after expiry, you need to identify why it continues. A lease that rolls on under its terms, continues by statute, or continues by tacit relocation may not be analysed in the same way in every case. The legal mechanism matters.

For conveyancers and taxpayers, the practical consequence is that the SDLT position may need to be revisited when the lease term changes or appears to continue beyond its original end date.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach the issue is to ask the following questions.

• What was the original term of the lease?
• Has anything happened after grant that changes the expected end date?
• Is the lease being extended by agreement, varied, or simply continuing automatically?
• What is the legal mechanism for that continuation or extension?
• Does the change leave the existing lease in place, or does it amount in substance to a new lease?
• If Scots law applies, is the continuation said to arise by tacit relocation, and if so, what is the effect of that continuation on the lease term?

The key point is that SDLT follows the legal effect of what has happened, not just the label used by the parties. Calling something an extension or variation does not by itself settle the SDLT treatment.

Example

Illustration: a tenant has a lease due to end on 31 December. Before that date, landlord and tenant agree that the tenant may remain for a further period. The SDLT question is not just whether the tenant stays in occupation. The real question is whether the original lease has been validly extended, whether the parties have created a new lease, or whether the lease continues automatically under the relevant legal rules. Each possibility can lead to a different SDLT analysis.

Why this can be difficult in practice

These cases are often fact-sensitive because property lawyers may describe the arrangement one way, while SDLT law may require a more exact analysis of its legal effect.

There are several common sources of difficulty:

• The documents may be unclear about whether the parties intended a variation of the existing lease or a fresh grant.
• The legal consequences can differ between England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland depending on the property law rules involved.
• Tacit relocation is a specialist Scots law concept, so its effect needs to be understood in that legal context before reaching an SDLT conclusion.
• A continuation in occupation after expiry does not always mean the same thing for tax purposes. The reason for the continuation matters.

Where the only material available is a manual heading, the detailed conclusion cannot safely be stated without the underlying manual text or legislation. The correct treatment depends on the precise legal facts.

Key takeaways

• For SDLT, the term of a lease may change if the lease is extended, varied, or continues after its original expiry date.
• You must identify the legal effect of what happened, not just the wording used by the parties.
• Continuation by tacit relocation is a specific issue that may arise under Scots law and can affect how the lease term is analysed.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Lease Extensions and Variations: Terms, Tacit Relocation, and Content Overview

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here