Bare trusts and stamp duty: whose position counts?
Bare trusts and SDLT
Where a trustee merely holds property for another person, SDLT will usually look at that other person’s position. The trust documents decide whether this treatment applies.
- A bare trustee normally cannot deal with the property without permission.
- Unpaid trust expenses do not necessarily prevent a bare trust.
- Grants of leases have separate statutory treatment.
Scroll down for the full analysis.
Read the original guidance here:
Bare trusts and stamp duty: whose position counts?
When someone buys property as a bare trustee, stamp duty usually looks past the trustee to the person for whom they hold it. That can affect the SDLT result.
The name on the title is not always the person whose position matters.
What this rule is about
A trust can separate the legal owner from the person who really benefits from a property. In a bare trust, the trustee holds the property for someone else.
The trustee has very limited freedom to decide what happens to it.
SDLT usually counts that person. Nominees normally cannot change SDLT simply by putting another name on the paperwork.
What matters is the rights created by the trust. Calling an arrangement a bare trust is not enough.
What the official source says
HMRC’s manual says a bare trust exists where each person for whom the trustee holds property is absolutely entitled to it. They may call for the property.
The trustee needs their permission to deal with it.
The manual is HMRC’s view, not the law itself. The Finance Act gives a similar test: the person must have the exclusive right to the property, apart from limited rights the trustee has to meet unpaid amounts.
- The person can receive the property straight away, or after giving any notice required by the trust.
- The trustee cannot sell, transfer or otherwise deal with the property without that person’s permission.
- Unpaid taxes, costs and similar trust expenses can still be dealt with first.
- Two or more people can have these rights jointly.
- A person who would have the rights but is under 18 or under a disability is also included by the Act.
Where property is bought through a bare trustee, HMRC says SDLT applies as though the property belonged to the person or people behind that trustee. The legislation generally produces that result.
What this means in practice
Look beyond the Land Registry title and the purchase contract, because the named buyer may be a trustee even where another person holds the relevant rights. Check the trust.
SDLT may treat someone else as buyer.
Other SDLT rules may depend on that person’s position. They can turn on what that person owns, has owned, or is buying.
A nominee does not normally create a separate SDLT identity.
- Read the trust document before deciding whose SDLT position to use.
- Check whether the trustee can act alone or needs instructions.
- Identify every person who has the right to the property.
- Keep the trust documents with the SDLT papers.
There is an important limit. A lease grant does not attract the usual look-through rule in the same way.
In that situation, the Act has separate rules which treat the bare trustee as the buyer or seller of the whole lease interest.
How to analyse it
Start with the documents, not the label. Ask who can require the trustee to transfer or otherwise deal with the property.
- Find the trust deed, nominee agreement or declaration of trust.
- List the people for whom the trustee says they hold the property.
- Check whether each person can demand their share or direct what happens to it.
- Check whether the trustee has a real choice about a sale or transfer.
- Separate a power to meet unpaid expenses from a wider power to control the property.
- Check whether the transaction is a grant of a lease, as different rules apply.
You might think a trustee who pays bills cannot be a bare trustee. That is not the point.
A limited right to recover unpaid outgoings does not, on its own, prevent absolute entitlement.
Example
Amir pays £300,000 for a flat. His sister, Leila, is named as the buyer because she acts only as his nominee.
Under their signed agreement, Amir may require Leila to transfer the flat to him whenever he chooses, and she cannot sell it without his instruction. Those rights matter.
On those facts, the arrangement has the features HMRC describes as a bare trust. SDLT would generally consider Amir’s position rather than treating Leila as an independent buyer.
Change one detail and the answer may change. If Leila can choose whether to sell the flat, or decide which family member should receive it, she may have powers that go beyond a bare trust.
Why this can be difficult in practice
Trust documents may be short, old, or written for a different purpose. They may use the word nominee while also giving the trustee broad control.
That contradiction is where problems arise.
Money movements can also confuse matters. Who paid the price may be useful evidence, but it does not replace the legal rights set out in the documents.
- A title in one name does not prove that person is the relevant person for SDLT.
- The phrase bare trust does not decide the issue by itself.
- A right to recover expenses is different from a right to decide the property’s future.
- Lease grants need separate checking under the statutory lease rules.
Key takeaways
- SDLT usually looks through a bare trustee to the person they hold property for.
- The trust terms, not the label, decide whether the trust is bare.
- Check lease transactions separately because the general rule has an exception.
Technical analysis
For advisers, and for anyone who wants to check the law behind this page. You do not need this section to understand the guidance above.
Legislation
- FA 2003 section 105 — applies the SDLT trust rules in Schedule 16
- FA 2003 Schedule 16 para 1 — defines a bare trust and absolute entitlement
- FA 2003 Schedule 16 para 3 — treats bare trustee acts as beneficiary acts; sets special SDLT treatment for lease grants
Official guidance
The pages below are HMRC’s guidance. Guidance is not law. It sets out how HMRC reads the legislation, and it is not binding on you, on a tribunal or on a court. Where guidance and the legislation differ, the legislation wins. HMRC can also change or withdraw guidance, and it may not cover your facts.
Where this is not settled
- Whether a trust is bare depends on the trust deed and the rights it gives the people involved.
- A label such as nominee, bare trust or declaration of trust does not settle the issue if the document gives the trustee wider powers.
- The supplied statutory text is current only to 17 November 2025. Current-law status should be checked for a transaction after that date.
Evidence you would need
This kind of case is decided on the facts of the individual property. These are the records that usually settle it, and the ones an adviser would ask you for.
- The signed trust deed, declaration of trust or nominee agreement
- Any later deed changing the trustee’s powers or the shares held
- Documents showing who can direct a sale, transfer or other dealing
- Evidence of unpaid trust expenses, taxes, costs or other charges
- The contract and lease documents where the transaction involves a lease
Explore this with an AI
Readers often want to test their own situation. Copy the prompt below into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. It hands the model the actual legislation for this page rather than letting it answer from memory, and tells it to be explicit about what is uncertain. What comes back is information, not advice – check it against the links above.
I am researching UK Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT), which applies in England and Northern Ireland. MY QUESTION Bare trusts and stamp duty: whose position counts? [Replace this with your own situation: what you are buying, the price, the dates, who the buyer is, and what you plan to do with the property.] THE LAW THIS TURNS ON - FA 2003 section 105 - applies the SDLT trust rules in Schedule 16 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/14/section/105/2025-11-17 - FA 2003 Schedule 16 para 1 - defines a bare trust and absolute entitlement https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/14/schedule/16/paragraph/1/2025-11-17 - FA 2003 Schedule 16 para 3 - treats bare trustee acts as beneficiary acts https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/14/schedule/16/paragraph/3/2025-11-17 - FA 2003 Schedule 16 para 3 - sets special SDLT treatment for lease grants https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/14/schedule/16/paragraph/3/2025-11-17 HMRC's guidance page on this topic (guidance, not law): https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm31710 HOW I WANT YOU TO ANSWER 1. Work from the legislation above. Read it before answering. HMRC guidance is HMRC's view of the law, not the law, and does not bind a tribunal or a court. 2. Tell me what the rule actually requires, in plain English. 3. Tell me which facts decide the answer, and which facts would change it. 4. Tell me what evidence I would need to support the position. 5. Be explicit about anything unsettled or fact-sensitive. Do not guess. 6. Your training data has a cutoff and SDLT rates and reliefs change at fiscal events. Say so if you are not sure the law is current. POINTS ALREADY KNOWN TO BE UNCERTAIN ON THIS TOPIC - Whether a trust is bare depends on the trust deed and the rights it gives the people involved. - A label such as nominee, bare trust or declaration of trust does not settle the issue if the document gives the trustee wider powers. - The supplied statutory text is current only to 17 November 2025. Current-law status should be checked for a transaction after that date. Do not give me a conclusion you cannot support from the provisions above.
Legislation links show Finance Act 2003 as it stood on 2025-11-17. The law may have changed since, and the rules that apply are those in force on the date of your transaction. The official guidance this page is based on is here.
This page was last updated on 1 September 2026
Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Bare trusts and stamp duty: whose position counts?
Search Land Tax Advice with Google
