HMRC SDLT: Guide to Group Relief and SDLT Liability in Partnership Transfers
Understanding Group Relief in SDLT for Partnerships
This guide explains the application of group relief in the context of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) when a chargeable interest is transferred to a partnership. It outlines the steps to determine SDLT liability and highlights the role of Paragraph 27A in reducing the chargeable consideration through group relief.
- The transfer involves a chargeable interest from B Ltd to a partnership, requiring the application of specific SDLT provisions.
- B Ltd is identified as a relevant owner and a partner in the transaction, with C Ltd as a connected company and corresponding partner.
- The chargeable interest is apportioned between B Ltd and C Ltd, with a beneficial 50:50 split in this example.
- The sum of the lower proportions for each partner results in no chargeable consideration due to the application of Paragraph 27A.
- Paragraph 27A allows for a reduction in the SDLT charge, treating C Ltd as a corresponding partner, resulting in a 50% reduction.
- A claim for group relief must be made in the land transaction return, adhering to standard group relief conditions with specific modifications.
“`

Read the original guidance here:
HMRC SDLT: Guide to Group Relief and SDLT Liability in Partnership Transfers
Understanding SDLT Group Relief: A Step-by-Step Guide
Overview
When a property interest is transferred under the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) rules, certain agreements can allow for exemptions or reductions in duty. One such rule is the application of paragraph 27A, which applies when dealing with transfers of interests to members of a partnership.
Example Scenario
In this example, we have a company, B Ltd, which is transferring a chargeable interest to an Encompassing Partnership (EP) or a Limited Liability Partnership (ELP).
To properly assess the SDLT liability for this transaction, we will follow a series of steps as provided in the regulations.
Step 1: Identify the Owners
First, we need to identify the relevant owner or owners of the chargeable interest.
– In our case, B Ltd is a relevant owner. This is because it holds a proportion of the chargeable interest before the transfer and becomes a partner in the partnership immediately after the transfer occurs.
Step 2: Identify Corresponding Partners
Next, we need to determine who the corresponding partners are for each relevant owner.
– B Ltd is the corresponding partner for itself because it becomes a partner in the partnership following the transfer.
– Additionally, if there is another company connected to B Ltd, named C Ltd, which is part of the same group, it also counts as a corresponding partner due to the relationship under paragraph 27A.
Step 3: Assess the Proportion of Chargeable Interest
Now, we need to assess the proportion of the chargeable interest held by each partner.
– B Ltd holds 100% of the chargeable interest right before the transfer.
– With two corresponding partners identified (B Ltd and C Ltd), we can divide this interest. A 50:50 split will likely result in the most beneficial outcome for both companies.
Step 4: Determine the Lower Proportion
Next, we calculate the lower proportion of the chargeable interest attributable to the partners.
– Each partner is attributed a 50% share of the chargeable interest based on the split from Step 3.
– Since this share is equal to their respective partnership share for both B Ltd and C Ltd, it confirms that the lower proportion for each is 50.
Step 5: Sum the Lower Proportions
Now, we add the lower proportions together to determine the total.
– In this example: 50 (B Ltd) + 50 (C Ltd) = 100.
This means the total lower proportion, also called the Stampable Land Proportion (SLP), is 100.
Understanding the Implications
Since the SLP totals 100, there is no chargeable consideration for this particular transaction.
Application of Paragraph 27A and Group Relief
If paragraph 27A had not been applicable, C Ltd would not have been considered a corresponding partner. In that case, B Ltd would have held 100% chargeable interest, and the SLP would only be 50 (reflecting half the market value of the chargeable interest).
Instead, because of the provisions in paragraph 27A, the SLP remains 100. This results in a zero charge for SDLT instead of a transaction charge on 50% of the market value of the chargeable interest, which represents a significant reduction.
– The difference in charges amounts to a 50% reduction. The SDLT liability went from being based on 50% of the market value down to 0% as a direct result of C Ltd’s classification as a corresponding partner.
Additionally, paragraph 27A is a form of group relief. Therefore, the partnership is required to file a specific claim for this group relief within their land transaction return.
– This claim should reflect any reduction in charge based on our calculations, which in this example saves 50% of tax.
– Note that this claim is also subject to standard group relief conditions (as outlined in Schedule 7, paragraph 2), though some adaptations under paragraph 27A(3) apply.
Additional Points to Consider
– Ensure documentation of the partnership agreements is in place, as these will substantiate the claims for group relief.
– Review your company’s structure carefully to confirm all requirements under the relevant provisions of SDLT are met.
– Keep accurate records of the valuation of the chargeable interest being transferred to support your SDLT claim.
– It’s advisable to consult with a qualified accountant or tax advisor for assistance with these transactions to ensure compliance with all legal duties.







