Non-Cash Consideration Exclusions for Lease Obligations Under FA03/SCH17A

SDLT on Lease Grants: Tenant Obligations Ignored as Chargeable Consideration

When a lease is granted, SDLT is usually charged on rent and any premium, not on normal tenant obligations in the lease. Common promises such as repairing, insuring, paying service charges or management costs, giving a guarantee, or paying penal rent for breach are generally ignored as chargeable consideration, although unusual obligations may still need closer review.

• Usual tenant covenants to repair, maintain, or insure the property are not treated as chargeable consideration for SDLT on the grant of a lease.
• Tenant payments for services, repairs, maintenance, insurance, and the landlord’s management costs are also excluded.
• Other tenant obligations may be ignored if they are ordinary lease terms that would not affect the open market rent a tenant would pay.
• A guarantee of the rent or of the tenant’s lease obligations, and penal or increased rent payable because of breach, are not chargeable consideration under this rule.
• On a transfer of the lease by landlord or tenant, taking on or being released from one of these excluded obligations is also not chargeable consideration.
• The key practical issue is whether an unusual obligation has real economic value and could affect the rent bargain, in which case the wider SDLT rules should still be checked.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT on lease grants: tenant obligations that are ignored as chargeable consideration

This page explains a narrow but important SDLT rule for leases. When a lease is granted, the tenant may take on a range of obligations besides paying rent or a premium. Some of those obligations might look like “consideration” for the lease. But the legislation excludes certain common lease obligations from chargeable consideration, so they do not themselves create an SDLT charge.

What this rule is about

SDLT is charged on chargeable consideration given for a land transaction. For a lease, that usually means things like rent and any premium. But leases often also require the tenant to do other things, such as keep the property in repair, insure it, or reimburse the landlord for services or management costs.

The rule here is designed to stop ordinary lease covenants from being treated as separate non-cash consideration for SDLT purposes. In other words, the law recognises that many lease obligations are part of the normal commercial structure of a lease and should not, by themselves, increase the SDLT charge.

What the official source says

The source says that certain usual obligations, and payments made under them, are not chargeable consideration on the grant of a lease.

These excluded items are:

• an undertaking by the tenant to repair, maintain or insure the demised premises
• an undertaking by the tenant to pay amounts for services, repairs, maintenance, insurance, or the landlord’s management costs
• any other tenant obligation that is not of a kind that would affect the rent a tenant would be willing to pay in the open market
• a guarantee of the rent or of the tenant’s other obligations under the lease
• a penal rent, or increased rent in the nature of a penal rent, payable because the tenant has breached an obligation under the lease

The source also says that, where a lease is transferred by either landlord or tenant, the assumption or release of one of these excluded obligations is also not chargeable consideration.

What this means in practice

The practical effect is that SDLT on a lease is not increased simply because the lease contains normal tenant covenants.

For example, a tenant’s promise to keep the premises in repair is usually part of the basic lease bargain. It is not treated as a separate item of value given for the grant of the lease. The same is true where the tenant agrees to insure the premises, pay service charges, or reimburse management costs.

This matters because SDLT can apply not only to cash payments but also to non-cash consideration. Without this exclusion, many standard lease clauses could potentially be argued to have value and therefore to increase the tax charge. The rule prevents that result for the categories listed.

It also helps when analysing assignments or other transfers of leases. If the incoming or outgoing party assumes or is released from one of these excluded obligations, that assumption or release is not itself chargeable consideration under this rule.

How to analyse it

When looking at a lease, it helps to separate the tenant’s obligations into two groups.

First, identify the obvious chargeable consideration. This will usually include rent and any premium, and may include other items if the wider SDLT rules bring them in.

Second, identify obligations that fall within this exclusion. Ask:

• Is the tenant simply promising to repair, maintain, or insure the premises?
• Is the tenant agreeing to pay for services, repairs, maintenance, insurance, or the landlord’s management costs?
• Is the obligation a normal lease covenant that would not affect the open market rent a tenant would be prepared to pay?
• Is the clause only a guarantee of rent or of the tenant’s lease obligations?
• Is the payment triggered only by breach and properly characterised as penal rent or increased rent in the nature of penal rent?

If the answer is yes, the source indicates that the obligation or payment is not chargeable consideration for this purpose.

The open market rent point is especially important. The source draws a distinction between ordinary obligations that do not affect what rent a tenant would pay in the market, and obligations that might be so unusual or burdensome that they do affect the rent bargain. The exclusion covers the former.

Example

A landlord grants a 10-year commercial lease. The tenant must pay annual rent, keep the premises in repair, reimburse the landlord through a service charge for cleaning and maintenance of common parts, insure the premises, and pay a higher sum if it breaches a repairing covenant.

On the source material, the rent is part of the chargeable consideration. But the tenant’s repairing covenant, insurance obligation, service charge obligation, and the penal or increased rent payable on breach are all within the listed exclusions and are not chargeable consideration merely because they appear in the lease.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The difficult area is usually not the standard obligations expressly listed, but the catch-all category for “any other obligation” that does not affect the rent a tenant would pay in the open market.

That requires judgement. A routine covenant is likely to fall within the exclusion. But if the tenant is taking on an unusual obligation with real economic value to the landlord, it may be harder to say that it has no effect on open market rent. The source does not set out a detailed test for drawing that line, so the answer may depend on the facts and on the commercial substance of the clause.

Another point of care is that this is an exclusion for certain lease obligations. It does not mean that every payment connected with a lease is ignored for SDLT. The wider SDLT rules on lease consideration still need to be considered. The correct approach is to identify what the payment or obligation really is, then decide whether this specific exclusion applies.

Key takeaways

• Normal tenant obligations on the grant of a lease are not automatically chargeable consideration for SDLT.
• Repairing, maintenance, insurance, service charge, management cost, guarantee, and penal rent obligations are specifically excluded by the source.
• The main fact-sensitive issue is whether an “other obligation” is truly a normal covenant that would not affect the open market rent.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Non-Cash Consideration Exclusions for Lease Obligations Under FA03/SCH17A

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here