Lease Renunciation and New Lease Grant: Example 3 Explained

SDLT when an old lease ends and a new lease is granted

If a lease is not just amended but is legally ended and replaced with a new lease, SDLT is usually considered again on the new lease. This is especially important where the new arrangement gives a longer term, a higher rent, or both. The legal effect of the documents matters more than the label used, and for Scottish land transactions from April 2015 onwards, LBTT generally applies instead of SDLT.

• A simple lease variation can have different tax consequences from a surrender, renunciation, or regrant of the lease.
• If the old lease has been given up and a replacement lease granted, the new lease is normally treated as a fresh land transaction for SDLT.
• Increasing the lease term, the rent, or both may suggest that the parties have created a new lease in law.
• Calling a document a “variation” does not decide the SDLT position; the legal substance is what counts.
• For land in Scotland from April 2015 onwards, SDLT generally no longer applies and LBTT is the relevant tax.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT and lease variations: renouncing an old lease and granting a new one

This page is about a very specific SDLT point: what happens if an existing lease is given up and replaced with a new lease so that the term is longer, the rent is higher, or both. The archived source sits within HMRC’s guidance on the term of a lease. Although the source text provided here is only a heading and archive note, the legal issue is clear: SDLT treatment depends on whether the parties have merely varied an existing lease or have instead ended it and created a new lease.

What this rule is about

For SDLT, a lease is a land transaction in its own right. If the original lease remains in place and is simply varied, the tax result may differ from the position where the original lease is surrendered or renounced and a new lease is granted.

This matters because a new lease can trigger a fresh SDLT charge. In practice, extending the term or increasing the rent may look like a simple amendment, but legally it can amount to replacing one lease with another. If that happens, SDLT analysis starts again on the new lease rather than continuing with the old one.

The archived note is also important historically. Since April 2015, SDLT no longer applies to land transactions in Scotland. Scottish transactions from that point are generally dealt with under LBTT instead. So this HMRC material is mainly relevant to SDLT transactions outside Scotland, and to older Scottish transactions from before LBTT began.

What the official source says

The source heading identifies an example dealing with the renunciation of an existing lease and the grant of a new lease where the term and/or the rent is increased. Even without the body text, the heading shows the point HMRC was addressing: where the old lease is brought to an end and a replacement lease is granted, HMRC treats that as involving a new lease transaction rather than just an adjustment to the old one.

The archive warning adds a separate jurisdictional point. HMRC notes that from April 2015 SDLT no longer applies to land transactions in Scotland, because LBTT took over there.

What this means in practice

The practical question is not just “have the parties changed the lease?” but “what have they done in law?”

If the parties have actually ended the old lease and granted a new one, the new lease normally needs to be considered as a fresh land transaction for SDLT purposes. That can matter because SDLT on leases is sensitive to matters such as the term granted and the rent payable. Increasing the term or rent under a newly granted lease may therefore affect the tax position.

By contrast, if the document is a true variation of the existing lease and does not amount in law to a surrender and regrant, the SDLT consequences may be different. The source heading points to the case where the line has been crossed and there is a replacement lease.

For conveyancers and taxpayers, this means the drafting and legal effect of the documents matter. A document described commercially as an “extension” or “variation” may still amount, in substance, to the old lease ending and a new lease beginning.

How to analyse it

When looking at a lease change of this kind, a sensible framework is:

• Identify exactly what has happened to the original lease. Does it continue, or has it been given up, surrendered, or renounced?
• Check whether a new lease has been granted. If so, treat that as a separate SDLT question.
• Look at what has changed. The source heading specifically points to an increased term, an increased rent, or both.
• Distinguish legal effect from labels. Calling a document a “variation” does not settle the tax analysis.
• Check the date and jurisdiction. If the land is in Scotland and the transaction is from April 2015 onwards, SDLT is not the relevant tax.

The key underlying point is that SDLT follows the legal nature of the land transaction. If the old lease has gone and a new one has been created, the tax analysis generally follows the new grant.

Example

Illustration: a tenant holds a lease with 10 years left to run at an agreed rent. The landlord and tenant later agree that the tenant will have a longer term and pay a higher rent. If they do this by bringing the existing lease to an end and granting a replacement lease, the replacement lease is the transaction that must be analysed for SDLT. The fact that the tenant was already in occupation under the earlier lease does not by itself prevent the new grant from being a fresh taxable event.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The difficult part is often deciding whether the parties have merely altered the existing lease or have created a new one in law. That is a legal characterisation exercise, not just a matter of reading the commercial summary.

In practice, uncertainty can arise where:

• the documents use mixed language, referring both to a variation and to a surrender or regrant
• the term and rent are changed together, which can point towards a more fundamental restructuring
• the parties intend continuity for commercial reasons, but the legal drafting produces a new lease
• historic Scottish material is being reviewed without noticing that SDLT ceased to apply there from April 2015

The source provided here does not give the full worked example, so it does not resolve every detail of the SDLT computation. What it clearly signals, however, is the importance of recognising when a lease amendment is actually a replacement lease.

Key takeaways

• If an existing lease is renounced or otherwise ended and a new lease is granted, SDLT analysis usually focuses on the new lease as a fresh transaction.
• Changes to term or rent can be significant because they may indicate that the old lease has been replaced rather than merely varied.
• For Scottish land transactions from April 2015 onwards, SDLT is generally not the relevant tax; LBTT applies instead.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Lease Renunciation and New Lease Grant: Example 3 Explained

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here