Tenant Entry Before Lease: SDLT Changes in Scotland from April 2015

SDLT timing when a tenant moves in before a lease is formally completed

This issue concerns whether Stamp Duty Land Tax can arise before a lease is formally signed, where a tenant is allowed into a property early. For historic Scottish SDLT cases, the key question is often when the tenant actually took possession and whether the arrangement had already been put into effect in practice. Since April 2015, Scottish land transactions have generally fallen under LBTT instead of SDLT.

• SDLT may look at early possession of the property, not just the date the final lease is signed.
• This point is mainly relevant to older Scottish SDLT cases, because SDLT no longer applies to Scottish land transactions from April 2015 onwards.
• Advisers should check the facts carefully, including when the tenant got access, started occupation, paid rent, or began fitting out the premises.
• The legal basis of the early occupation matters: it may be significant if there was already a settled agreement, even if the formal lease documents were not complete.
• If the final lease simply records what the parties had already agreed and acted on, the earlier entry date may affect the tax filing and payment timetable.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT where a tenant takes possession before missives are concluded or a formal lease is granted

This page deals with a narrow but important timing issue in Stamp Duty Land Tax. It concerns cases where a tenant is allowed into the property before the contract documents are fully concluded or before the lease is formally granted. The practical question is whether SDLT can arise at that earlier stage, rather than waiting for the final paperwork.

What this rule is about

SDLT does not look only at the final signed lease. In some cases, tax consequences can arise when a person is allowed to take possession of land before the legal documents are fully completed. That matters because SDLT often depends on when a land transaction is treated as taking place.

The source material is specifically about a tenant taking entry before missives have been concluded or before a formal lease has been granted. In Scots property practice, missives are the formal letters that make up the binding contract. If those missives are not yet concluded, or the lease has not yet been formally executed, there may still be an earlier practical handover of the property.

The archived note also flags an important jurisdiction point: from April 2015, SDLT no longer applies to land transactions in Scotland. Scottish land transactions are instead within Land and Buildings Transaction Tax. So this issue is mainly relevant to historic Scottish SDLT cases, rather than current Scottish transactions.

What the official source says

The official source identifies the topic as one of the miscellaneous SDLT provisions and describes the situation as a tenant taking entry before missives have been concluded or before a formal lease has been granted.

Although the extracted text is only a heading and archive note, the clear implication is that SDLT treatment may need to be considered where occupation begins before the full legal steps creating the lease have been completed.

The archive note makes two points clear:

• the material relates to SDLT rules that formerly applied in Scotland;
• for transactions from April 2015 onwards in Scotland, the relevant tax is LBTT, not SDLT.

What this means in practice

The practical issue is timing. If a tenant is allowed into premises early, you cannot assume that SDLT only becomes relevant when the formal lease is eventually signed. Early entry may itself have legal significance for tax purposes, depending on the surrounding facts and the wider SDLT rules on substantial performance and lease transactions.

For historic Scottish transactions, this means advisers and taxpayers may need to look beyond the date on the lease document. They may need to identify:

• when the tenant first took possession or occupation;
• whether there was already an agreement that was sufficiently settled to have tax effect;
• whether the later formal lease simply recorded what had already been put into effect in practice.

This can affect the effective date of the transaction and, in turn, filing and payment timing.

For current Scottish transactions, the archived SDLT page is not the operative regime. The equivalent timing questions may still matter under LBTT, but they must be analysed under Scottish LBTT legislation and guidance, not by applying old SDLT material directly.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach this issue is to work through the facts in order.

• First, identify the jurisdiction and date. If the land is in Scotland and the transaction is from April 2015 onwards, SDLT is not the relevant tax.
• Second, identify what happened on the ground. Did the tenant actually take entry, receive keys, begin fitting out, or start paying rent before the formal lease was granted?
• Third, identify the legal basis for that occupation. Was there an agreed bargain in substance, even if the formal documents were incomplete? Or was the occupation more temporary, informal, or conditional?
• Fourth, consider whether the early occupation could amount to the transaction being put into effect before formal completion.
• Fifth, compare the early arrangement with the final lease. If the final lease simply formalised what had already been agreed and acted on, the earlier date may be important.

The key point is that tax analysis should follow the real legal and factual sequence, not just the date of the final signed document.

Example

Illustration: a tenant is allowed into commercial premises in March under an agreed heads of terms arrangement, starts trading, and begins paying an agreed rent. The formal Scottish lease is not signed until June. For a historic Scottish SDLT case, it may be necessary to consider whether the tenant’s March entry had SDLT significance, rather than assuming June is the only relevant date.

This does not mean early entry always creates an SDLT charge. The answer depends on the precise facts and the wider statutory rules. But the early possession point cannot safely be ignored.

Why this can be difficult in practice

These cases are often fact-sensitive because property transactions do not always move in a neat legal sequence. Occupation may begin while parties are still negotiating final terms, or while formal drafting is still underway.

The difficult questions often include:

• whether there was already a binding agreement, or only ongoing negotiations;
• whether the tenant’s occupation was temporary or was really the start of the lease arrangement;
• whether payments made before the formal lease were rent under an agreed bargain or something more provisional;
• whether the final lease changed material terms, suggesting that the earlier occupation should not simply be treated as implementation of the same transaction.

The source material itself is sparse, so it points to the topic rather than resolving every borderline case. In practice, the answer depends on the interaction between the early entry facts and the wider SDLT rules on when a land transaction is treated as taking place.

Key takeaways

• For historic Scottish SDLT cases, a tenant taking entry before a formal lease is granted may affect the timing of the tax analysis.
• You should not look only at the date the lease was signed; early possession may matter.
• From April 2015, Scottish land transactions fall under LBTT rather than SDLT.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Tenant Entry Before Lease: SDLT Changes in Scotland from April 2015

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here