Guide on Withdrawal of Group Relief and Stamp Duty Land Tax Calculation

How SDLT Group Relief Is Clawed Back When Property Leaves the Group

If SDLT group relief is later withdrawn, the tax is recalculated as if the relief had never been claimed. The amount payable depends on how much of the original property interest is still held by the buyer or a relevant associated company when the withdrawal event happens. If all of the original interest is still held, the full SDLT charge can arise; if only part remains, the clawback is reduced on a proportionate market value basis using values at the original effective date.

• Group relief on an intra-group land transfer can be withdrawn if a later event triggers a clawback.
• The clawback looks at the chargeable interest still held by the purchaser and any relevant associated company at the time of withdrawal.
• If the same interest is still held in full, SDLT is charged as it would have been on the original transaction without group relief.
• If only part of the original interest remains, SDLT is charged on an appropriate proportion of the original transaction.
• The proportion is based on market values at the original effective date, not the value when the relief is withdrawn.
• Where the original transaction was a lease granted at a rent, the rent element must also be included in the SDLT calculation.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

How SDLT group relief is clawed back when the property interest later leaves the group

This page explains how much Stamp Duty Land Tax may become payable if SDLT group relief was claimed on a land transfer within a group, but a later event causes that relief to be withdrawn. The key point is that the clawback is linked to how much of the original property interest is still held by the purchaser, or by a relevant associated company, when the withdrawal event happens.

What this rule is about

Group relief can remove or reduce SDLT on certain transfers of land between companies in the same group. But that relief is not always final. If a later event occurs that triggers withdrawal of the relief, SDLT is then charged as though the relief had never been claimed.

The rule covered here is about the amount of relief that is withdrawn. In some cases, the whole relief is clawed back. In others, only part of it is withdrawn. The result depends on comparing:

• the chargeable interest the purchaser originally acquired on the effective date of the land transaction, and
• the chargeable interest still held by the purchaser and any relevant associated company when the withdrawal event occurs.

This matters because the SDLT charge on withdrawal is not always based on the whole original transfer. If only part of the original interest remains in the hands of the purchaser or a relevant associated company, the clawback is proportionate.

What the official source says

The HMRC manual states that where group relief must be withdrawn, the effect is to tax the chargeable interest remaining with the purchaser and any relevant associated company as if no claim to group relief had been made.

If the chargeable interest held at the time of withdrawal is the same as the chargeable interest originally transferred, the SDLT payable is the amount that would have been payable on the original land transaction if group relief had not been claimed.

For this purpose, the chargeable consideration is taken to be the market value of the chargeable interest transferred by the original transaction. If the original acquisition was the grant of a lease at a rent, the rent is also taken into account.

The position is modified if the chargeable interest still held at the time relief is withdrawn is not the same as the chargeable interest transferred originally. In that case, the SDLT payable is the amount that would have been payable on an appropriate proportion of the original transaction.

That proportion is worked out by comparing:

• the market value, at the effective date of the original transaction, of the chargeable interests held by the purchaser and any relevant associated companies at the time relief is withdrawn, with
• the market value, at that same original effective date, of the chargeable interest originally obtained by the purchaser.

What this means in practice

The practical question is not simply whether a withdrawal event has happened. It is also how much of the original property interest is still within the relevant companies when that happens.

If all of the original chargeable interest is still held by the purchaser or a relevant associated company, the clawback is effectively a full one. SDLT is recalculated on the original transaction as though group relief had never applied.

If only part of that original interest is still held, the clawback is only for that part. The legislation does this by using a market value fraction.

This can matter where, after the original intra-group transfer, the property has been split, partly disposed of, or otherwise altered so that what remains is not identical to the original interest transferred.

The valuation comparison is anchored to the effective date of the original land transaction. That is important. The rule is not asking what the retained interest is worth when relief is withdrawn. It is asking what that retained interest was worth by reference to the original effective date.

Where the original transaction was a lease granted at a rent, the rent element also remains part of the SDLT calculation. So the clawback is not limited to market value alone in those cases.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach this issue is:

• Identify the original land transaction on which group relief was claimed.
• Identify the chargeable interest the purchaser acquired on that transaction.
• Confirm that a later event has occurred which withdraws the relief.
• Ask what chargeable interest is held, at the time of that withdrawal event, by the purchaser and any relevant associated company.
• Decide whether that later-held interest is the same as the original interest or only part of it.
• If it is the same, calculate the SDLT that would have been due on the original transaction without group relief.
• If it is not the same, work out the appropriate proportion by comparing market values at the original effective date.
• If the original transaction involved the grant of a lease at a rent, include the rent element in the SDLT computation.

The phrase “relevant associated company” matters because the rule does not look only at what the original purchaser still holds itself. It also takes account of what is held by companies that fall within that associated-company concept for this purpose.

Example

This is an illustration only.

Company A transfers a freehold property to Company B and group relief is claimed. At the effective date of that transaction, the whole property has a market value of £10 million.

Later, an event occurs that causes the relief to be withdrawn. By that time, Company B and any relevant associated company still hold only part of the original property interest. Assume that the part still held would have had a market value of £4 million at the effective date of the original transfer.

In that case, the withdrawal is not based on the whole original transfer. Instead, the SDLT is calculated as if no group relief had been claimed on an appropriate proportion of the original transaction, here 4/10 of it.

If, instead, the whole original chargeable interest were still held by Company B or a relevant associated company, the SDLT clawback would be based on the full original transaction.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The rule sounds mechanical, but several points can be fact-sensitive.

• It may not be straightforward to identify whether the interest held at the withdrawal date is the same chargeable interest as the one originally transferred, especially if there have been later dealings with the land.
• The proportion is based on market values by reference to the original effective date, which may require retrospective valuation evidence.
• The involvement of “relevant associated companies” means the analysis may extend beyond the immediate purchaser.
• Lease cases can be more complex because the rent element must also be reflected in the SDLT calculation.

The HMRC manual summarises the mechanism, but the detailed application may depend on the exact nature of the original interest and what has happened to it since.

Key takeaways

• When SDLT group relief is withdrawn, the tax is recalculated as if the relief had never been claimed.
• The amount clawed back depends on how much of the original chargeable interest is still held by the purchaser and any relevant associated company.
• If the retained interest is only part of the original one, the SDLT charge is proportionate and is measured by reference to market values at the original effective date.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Guide on Withdrawal of Group Relief and Stamp Duty Land Tax Calculation

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here