Partnership Lease Transfer: No SDLT Due on Premium or Rental Elements

SDLT on Granting a Lease to a Partnership You Belong to

When you grant a non-residential lease to a partnership that you are joining or already belong to, SDLT is not always charged on the full premium and full rental value. Instead, the taxable amount is reduced to reflect the share of the property interest you still keep indirectly through the partnership, so SDLT is usually charged only on the part treated as passing to the other partners.

• For a lease, SDLT can apply to both the premium and the net present value of the rent.
• If the landlord is also a partner in the tenant partnership, special partnership rules may reduce the chargeable consideration.
• The reduction is worked out using the sum of the lower proportions (SLP), and the chargeable fraction is 100% minus the SLP.
• In the example, A had a 40% partnership share, so only 60% of the premium and rent was chargeable for SDLT purposes.
• This reduced £250,000 premium to £150,000 and £100,000 rental NPV to £60,000, with no SDLT due on the thresholds used in the example.
• In practice, care is needed over the SLP calculation, market value, rent as well as premium, connected party rules, and current SDLT rates and thresholds.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT on granting a lease to a partnership you are joining or already belong to

This page explains how SDLT can apply when a person grants a lease of non-residential property to a partnership of which they are a member. The rule matters because, in partnership cases, SDLT is not always charged on the full premium or the full rental value. Instead, the charge is reduced to reflect the transferor’s continuing economic interest in the property through the partnership.

What this rule is about

Ordinarily, a grant of a lease can trigger SDLT on two separate elements:

• any premium paid for the lease, and
• the net present value of the rent.

Special SDLT rules apply where land is transferred to a partnership. These rules are designed to recognise that, where the transferor is also a partner, they may still retain part of the economic benefit of the property through their partnership share. In broad terms, SDLT is charged only on the part treated as passing to the other partners.

The example in the official manual deals with a lease of non-residential property granted by an individual to a partnership in which she is one of three partners.

What the official source says

The official example assumes:

• Individual A grants a lease of non-residential property to a partnership.
• A is a member of that partnership.
• There are two other partners, and A is not connected with them for the purposes of Part 3.
• A is entitled to 40% of the income profits of the partnership.
• As a result of the transaction, A’s effective share of the leasehold interest falls from 100% to 40%.

Using the partnership rules, the sum of the lower proportions, or SLP, is 40. The manual cross-refers to paragraph 12 for that calculation.

The example then applies that percentage to both parts of the lease consideration:

• Premium: market value premium of £250,000 × (100 − 40)% = £150,000 chargeable consideration
• Rent: net present value of rents of £100,000 × (100 − 40)% = £60,000 chargeable consideration

The manual then notes that, on the thresholds stated in the example for non-residential property, neither amount gives rise to SDLT, so the SDLT due is nil.

What this means in practice

The key point is that the grant of the lease is not taxed by simply looking at the full premium and full rental value. Because the landlord is also a partner in the tenant partnership, the legislation reduces the chargeable consideration to reflect the part of the leasehold interest that the landlord is treated as still holding indirectly through the partnership.

In this example, A starts with 100% of the relevant interest and ends up with a 40% partnership share. So only the remaining 60% is treated as having moved away from A for SDLT purposes.

That 60% fraction is then applied separately to:

• the market value of the premium, and
• the net present value of the rent.

This can materially reduce the SDLT charge. In some cases, as here, it reduces the chargeable amounts below the relevant non-residential thresholds, so no SDLT is payable even though the lease itself has substantial value.

How to analyse it

When looking at a lease granted to a partnership, it helps to work through the issue in stages.

1. Identify whether the special partnership rules apply.

   The transaction must be one to which the special SDLT partnership provisions apply. The official example assumes that they do.

2. Identify the transferor’s partnership share.

   Here, A is entitled to 40% of the income profits of the partnership. That figure feeds into the SLP calculation.

3. Calculate the SLP.

   The example states that the sum of the lower proportions is 40. That means 40% of the interest is treated as still attributable to A.

4. Work out the chargeable fraction.

   The chargeable fraction is 100% minus the SLP. In the example, that is 60%.

5. Apply that fraction to each relevant element of consideration.

   For a lease, that means considering both:

   • the premium, using market value in the example, and
   • the net present value of the rents.

6. Compare the resulting figures with the relevant SDLT thresholds and rates.

   In the example, both reduced figures fall below the thresholds stated by the manual, so no SDLT is due.

Example

Illustration based on the official example:

• A grants a non-residential lease to a partnership.
• A has a 40% share in the partnership.
• SLP = 40.
• Chargeable fraction = 60%.
• Premium = £250,000.
• Chargeable premium = £250,000 × 60% = £150,000.
• NPV of rent = £100,000.
• Chargeable rental element = £100,000 × 60% = £60,000.

On the thresholds used in the manual example, neither amount produces an SDLT charge, so the SDLT payable is nil.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The example is straightforward, but real cases can be less simple.

First, the SLP calculation can be technical. The manual gives the answer here, but in practice you need to establish the relevant partnership profit shares and apply the statutory method correctly.

Second, lease transactions involve two possible SDLT charges: premium and rent. It is important not to look at only one of them.

Third, the example says the premium of £250,000 is accepted as market value. That matters because the calculation in the example uses market value of the premium, not merely the amount stated to be paid. If market value is disputed, the SDLT analysis may also change.

Fourth, the example depends on the parties not being connected for the purposes of Part 3. If connected party rules apply, the wider SDLT position may need closer analysis.

Finally, thresholds and rates can change over time. The example reflects the thresholds stated in the manual page, so the method is the main point to take from it, not the historic figures.

Key takeaways

• When a lease is granted to a partnership that includes the transferor, SDLT may be charged only on the part treated as passing to the other partners.
• The reduction is made by calculating the SLP and applying 100 minus that figure to the premium and to the rental NPV.
• Even where a lease has a substantial premium or rent, the reduced chargeable consideration may mean that no SDLT is payable.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Partnership Lease Transfer: No SDLT Due on Premium or Rental Elements

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here