Guide on Non-Notifiable Land Transactions and SDLT Form Completion

When an SDLT Return Does Not Need to Be Filed

Not every land transaction has to be reported to HMRC for Stamp Duty Land Tax. Whether a return is needed depends on the type of transaction, the amount of chargeable consideration, whether leases are involved, and whether the transaction is exempt or instead relies on a relief. A transaction can still need an SDLT return even if no tax is due.

• Buying a major interest in land, other than a lease grant, assignment or surrender, is usually not notifiable if the total chargeable consideration is under £40,000, taking linked transactions into account.
• Lease transactions have separate rules: for leases originally granted for 7 years or more, the filing test depends on rent and other consideration; for shorter leases, the zero-rate threshold applies.
• Some exempt transactions do not need to be notified, including certain transactions with no chargeable consideration, some transfers on death, and some transactions linked to divorce or civil partnership breakdown.
• Certain alternative property finance transactions and some partnership interest transfers may also be non-notifiable if they meet the statutory conditions and relevant thresholds.
• Exemptions and reliefs are different: if a transaction is otherwise notifiable and you need a relief to reduce SDLT to nil, the relief must still be claimed on an SDLT return.
• The correct test depends on the transaction category, and the £40,000 limit is not the same as the zero-rate threshold.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

When an SDLT return does not need to be filed

This page explains when a land transaction does not have to be notified to HMRC for Stamp Duty Land Tax purposes. That matters because a transaction can still be legally valid without an SDLT filing only if it falls within the notification exceptions. The rules are not the same as the rules on whether SDLT is actually payable. A transaction may be non-notifiable because it falls below certain limits, while other transactions must still be reported even if no tax ends up being due.

What this rule is about

Under the SDLT system, many land transactions must be reported to HMRC on a land transaction return. But not every transaction has to be notified. The source material lists categories of transactions that do not need an SDLT return.

The key point is that there is a difference between:

• whether a transaction is chargeable to SDLT in principle, and
• whether the transaction has to be notified to HMRC.

This distinction is important in practice. A buyer, adviser or conveyancer should first ask whether the transaction is notifiable at all. If it is not notifiable, no return is required. If it is notifiable, a return may still be needed even where the tax due is nil.

What the official source says

The official material identifies several categories of transaction that do not need to be notified.

First, for an acquisition of a major interest in land, other than the grant, assignment or surrender of a lease, no notification is needed if the total chargeable consideration is below £40,000. The source says this includes linked transactions, so the relevant figure is not looked at in isolation if the transaction is linked with others.

Secondly, special rules apply to leases.

• If a lease was originally granted for seven years or more, the grant of that lease does not need to be notified if the relevant rent is under £1,000 and any other chargeable consideration is under £40,000.
• If such a lease is assigned or surrendered, no notification is needed if the chargeable consideration for the assignment or surrender is below £40,000.
• If a lease was originally granted for less than seven years, the grant, assignment or surrender of that lease does not need to be notified if the chargeable consideration does not exceed the zero-rate threshold.

Thirdly, some transactions are exempt under Schedule 3 to the Finance Act 2003 and do not need to be notified. The source gives examples including:

• transactions with no chargeable consideration,
• some leases granted by registered social landlords,
• some transactions connected with the breakdown of a marriage or civil partnership,
• some transactions after death, and
• some variations of testamentary dispositions.

Fourthly, in the alternative property finance rules, certain “further transactions” exempt under section 71A(4) or 72A(4) of the Finance Act 2003 are not notifiable.

Fifthly, certain transfers of partnership interests under paragraphs 14 or 17 of Schedule 15 to the Finance Act 2003 do not need to be notified where the consideration does not exceed the zero-rate threshold.

Finally, where the land transaction is not the acquisition of a major interest, all acquisitions do not need to be notified if the consideration does not exceed the zero-rate threshold.

The source also makes an important separate point: if relief is being claimed, it must be claimed on an SDLT return. So if a return is otherwise required, relief cannot simply be assumed without filing. The fact that the relief reduces the SDLT to nil does not remove the need to notify.

What this means in practice

The practical question is not just “is any SDLT payable?” but “does this transaction have to be reported?”

In many low-value transactions, the answer will be no. For example, a freehold purchase for less than £40,000 will usually fall outside the notification requirement. But that does not mean all nil-tax transactions are non-notifiable. A transaction may still need to be reported because it exceeds the notification threshold, because it is a lease with its own rules, or because relief must be formally claimed.

Leases are where mistakes often happen. The filing position depends not only on the premium or other consideration, but also on:

• the original term of the lease, and
• for longer leases, the amount of relevant rent.

The reference to linked transactions also matters. A buyer cannot necessarily treat several connected purchases separately to stay below the filing limit. If the transactions are linked, the total chargeable consideration across them must be taken into account for this purpose.

Another practical point is that exempt transactions and relieved transactions are not the same thing. If a transaction is exempt under Schedule 3, it may not need to be notified. But if the transaction is not exempt and instead depends on a relief, the relief generally has to be claimed in a return if the transaction is otherwise notifiable.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach the issue is to work through the following questions in order.

1. What type of land transaction is this?

   Is it an acquisition of a major interest, a lease grant, a lease assignment, a lease surrender, a transfer of partnership interest, or something else?

2. If it is a major interest other than a lease event, what is the total chargeable consideration?

   Include linked transactions when testing the £40,000 threshold mentioned in the source.

3. If it is a lease, what was the original term?

   The source divides leases into those originally granted for seven years or more, and those originally granted for less than seven years.

4. For a lease originally granted for seven years or more, what are the relevant figures?

   For a grant, look at both the relevant rent and any other chargeable consideration. For an assignment or surrender, look at the chargeable consideration for that assignment or surrender.

5. Is the transaction exempt under Schedule 3?

   The source gives examples, but only some transactions in those broad categories are exempt. The exact exemption depends on the statutory conditions.

6. Is the transaction one of the specific alternative property finance or partnership cases mentioned?

   If so, check whether it falls within the cited statutory provisions and whether the consideration stays within the stated threshold.

7. Is the transaction below the zero-rate threshold where the source uses that test?

   The source refers in some cases to the zero-rate threshold rather than £40,000. Those are not interchangeable tests.

8. Are you relying on an exemption, or on a relief?

   If it is a relief rather than an exemption, and the transaction is otherwise notifiable, the relief must be claimed on form SDLT1.

Example

This is only an illustration based on the source material.

A buyer acquires a freehold property for £35,000, and there are no linked transactions. This is an acquisition of a major interest in land other than the grant, assignment or surrender of a lease. Because the total chargeable consideration is below £40,000, the source indicates that the transaction does not need to be notified.

By contrast, suppose a buyer enters into a transaction that would otherwise require a return, but believes a relief reduces the SDLT due to nil. In that case, the source says the relief must still be claimed on form SDLT1. So nil tax does not automatically mean no filing.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The source is brief, but the underlying rules can be fact-sensitive.

One difficulty is working out whether a transaction is linked with another transaction. The source says linked transactions must be included when testing the £40,000 threshold for acquisitions of major interests. Whether transactions are linked can itself require a separate legal analysis.

Another difficulty is that lease rules use different tests depending on the original term and the nature of the lease event. A person dealing with an assignment or surrender may focus only on the payment being made now, without checking how long the lease was when first granted.

There is also a risk of confusing exemption with relief. The source treats some Schedule 3 transactions as non-notifiable, but separately says that all reliefs must be claimed on the SDLT return. In practice, that means you need to know which legal route applies. Calling something a “relief” when it is actually an exemption, or vice versa, can lead to the wrong filing decision.

Finally, the source refers in some places to a £40,000 threshold and in others to the zero-rate threshold. Those are different concepts. The correct threshold depends on the category of transaction.

Key takeaways

• A transaction can be non-notifiable even though it is within the SDLT regime, but the filing exception depends on the transaction type and the relevant threshold.
• Lease transactions have their own notification rules, and the original lease term is a key part of the analysis.
• If a relief is needed to reduce SDLT to nil, it must generally be claimed on an SDLT return if the transaction is otherwise notifiable.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Guide on Non-Notifiable Land Transactions and SDLT Form Completion

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here