LBTT Guidance on Options and Pre-emption Rights in Land Transactions

LBTT on Options and Rights of Pre-emption in Scotland

LBTT can apply not only when Scottish land is bought, but also when a person acquires an option to buy land or a right of pre-emption. If that right is later exercised, there is usually a second taxable land transaction, and the earlier payment may have to be added to the purchase price when working out the tax.

• An option or right of pre-emption over Scottish land can itself be a chargeable land transaction for LBTT purposes.
• The effective date for the first transaction is usually the date the option or right is acquired, and LBTT may be charged on any option fee or similar consideration paid.
• If the right is later exercised, that creates a separate land transaction, and the grant and exercise may be treated as linked transactions.
• Where the transactions are linked, the consideration for the option or right is aggregated with the price paid for the land, and any LBTT already paid is credited.
• A reservation deposit or similar payment is not treated by Revenue Scotland as an option or right of pre-emption, so the legal effect of the agreement matters.
• The grant of an option is not the acquisition of a major interest in land, so notification depends on the LBTT notifiability rules, and in some cases two LBTT returns may be needed.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

LBTT on options and rights of pre-emption

This page explains how Land and Buildings Transaction Tax applies when someone acquires an option to buy land or a right of pre-emption over land in Scotland. The key point is that these rights can themselves be taxable land transactions, and if the right is later exercised there is usually a second land transaction to consider. In some cases the two transactions are linked, which affects how the tax is calculated.

What this rule is about

An option is a right to buy something, usually at a price already agreed or worked out by a formula. A right of pre-emption, often called a right of first refusal, is different. It gives someone the chance to buy before the property is offered to others, but not usually at a pre-agreed price.

These rights matter for LBTT because Scottish tax law treats the acquisition of an option or pre-emption right relating to land as a land transaction in its own right. That means tax can arise before the land itself is actually bought.

The source also notes one important limit: Revenue Scotland does not regard a reservation deposit or similar payment as an option or a right of pre-emption.

What the official source says

Revenue Scotland’s guidance says:

• LBTT can arise when an option or a right of pre-emption is acquired.
• The effective date for that transaction is the date the option or right is acquired.
• This applies even if the seller could satisfy the obligation in some other way, such as by paying money instead of completing a land transaction.
• If the option or pre-emption right is later exercised, that exercise gives rise to a separate land transaction, chargeable in its own right.
• The later transaction may be linked to the earlier grant of the option or right. If they are linked, the consideration is aggregated.
• At the time the option or right is acquired, LBTT is charged on the option price at the applicable rate.
• If the right is later exercised, LBTT is charged on the consideration for the land plus the option price, using the rate that applies to the total amount.
• Any LBTT already paid on the grant of the option or right is credited against the later tax charge.
• The grant of an option is not the acquisition of a major interest in land, so it is not notifiable unless LBTT is payable, or would be payable but for a relief.

The guidance also explains that where a sale includes a pre-emption right in favour of the seller, there may be two transactions: the sale itself and the creation of that pre-emption right.

What this means in practice

The practical effect is that you should not assume LBTT only becomes relevant when the land is actually bought. If money is paid for an option or a pre-emption right, that payment may itself be chargeable consideration for a land transaction.

If the right is later exercised, you do not simply ignore the earlier payment. Instead, the earlier option price is brought back into the calculation. The later purchase is taxed by reference to the total amount given for both:

• the grant of the option or right, and
• the acquisition of the land when the right is exercised.

Any tax already paid on the earlier grant is then set off.

This can also create compliance issues. If the original grant was not notifiable when looked at on its own, but later becomes taxable because it is linked with the exercised purchase, a further return may be needed. The source specifically says that two LBTT returns may be required in that situation.

Another practical point is that the grant of an option is not a major interest in land. That affects notification. It does not mean the option is outside LBTT. It means you need to consider the separate notification rules carefully rather than treating it like an ordinary purchase of land.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to analyse an arrangement is to ask the following questions.

• Has an option or right of pre-emption actually been granted, or is it only a reservation arrangement or deposit?
• Is the right connected with land in Scotland so that LBTT is potentially in point?
• What consideration was given for the grant of the option or right?
• When was the option or right acquired? That will usually be the effective date for the first transaction.
• Was the right later exercised, creating a second land transaction?
• Are the grant and the later exercise linked transactions?
• If they are linked, what is the total consideration across both transactions?
• Was any LBTT already paid on the grant, so that credit should be given on the later calculation?
• Do the notification rules require a return for the grant, the later purchase, or both?

When looking at linkage, the guidance says the grant and exercise may be linked and that this does not necessarily depend on what the parties intended at the time. So the analysis should focus on the statutory linked transaction rules, not only on what the parties say they meant to do.

Example

Illustration: A pays B for an option to buy B’s house before a stated date. That payment is consideration for acquiring the option. The acquisition of the option is a land transaction in its own right, and LBTT may be due depending on the amount paid and the applicable rules.

Later, A exercises the option and buys the house. That purchase is a separate land transaction. The tax position is then worked out by looking at the total of:

• the amount A paid for the option, and
• the amount A pays for the house.

If the option grant and the purchase are linked, the total consideration is used to determine the tax due, and any LBTT already paid on the option is credited.

The official worked example also notes that a further LBTT return may be needed for the option if linkage with the later purchase changes the tax result.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The difficult part is often not the basic principle, but identifying exactly what the arrangement is and how the transactions interact.

First, documents may use loose language. A payment described commercially as a booking fee, reservation fee, exclusivity payment, option fee, or deposit may not always have the same legal effect. The source makes clear that Revenue Scotland does not treat a reservation deposit or similar payment as an option or pre-emption right, but the actual legal rights created by the agreement still matter.

Secondly, the linked transaction analysis can be easy to miss. A party may think the option grant was too small to matter on its own, only to find that when the option is exercised the earlier payment must be aggregated with the purchase price.

Thirdly, notification can become awkward where no return was made for the grant at the time, but the later exercise means the earlier transaction now affects the tax outcome. The source expressly recognises that this may require two returns.

Finally, a right of pre-emption can be more fact-sensitive than an option because the price may not be fixed at the outset. Care is needed to identify when the right is acquired, what consideration is given for it, and whether a later sale under that right should be linked back to the original grant.

Key takeaways

• An option or right of pre-emption over land can itself be a chargeable land transaction for LBTT.
• If the right is later exercised, that usually creates a second land transaction, and the earlier payment may need to be aggregated with the purchase price.
• The grant of an option is not a major interest in land, so notification depends on the LBTT and notifiability rules rather than ordinary land purchase assumptions.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: LBTT Guidance on Options and Pre-emption Rights in Land Transactions

View all LBTT Guidance Pages Here