Guide on LBTT Tax Relief for Alternative Property Finance Arrangements

LBTT Relief for Alternative Property Finance Arrangements

This relief can stop Land and Buildings Transaction Tax being charged more than once when a property is bought through certain alternative finance structures instead of a standard mortgage. It only applies to specific arrangements set out in Schedule 7 of the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Scotland) Act 2013 and usually depends on a qualifying financial institution being involved.

• The relief is designed to prevent duplicate LBTT charges where a finance structure creates more than one land transaction as part of one overall property purchase.
• It covers three main models: the institution buys and leases the property before transferring it to the customer, the institution and customer buy as owners in common, or the institution buys and re-sells to the customer with mortgage finance.
• The relief is not a general exemption for all non-standard funding methods; the arrangement must fit one of the statutory categories.
• The law looks at the whole set of arrangements, including linked agreements, understandings, schemes, transactions, or series of transactions, not just one contract on its own.
• A key issue is whether the finance provider meets the statutory definition of a financial institution, as relief may fail if that test is not met.
• In practice, each step in the structure must be reviewed carefully, because the detailed conditions for each category determine whether relief applies and to which transaction.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

LBTT relief for alternative property finance arrangements

This page explains a Land and Buildings Transaction Tax relief designed for alternative property finance arrangements. The basic aim is to prevent LBTT being charged more than once where a property is acquired through a financing structure involving a financial institution, rather than through an ordinary purchase funded by a conventional mortgage.

What this rule is about

Some property finance arrangements are structured differently from a standard loan and mortgage. In particular, the financial institution may buy the property itself, hold a share in it, lease it to the customer, or sell it on under linked arrangements. Without a specific relief, these structures could trigger LBTT on more than one land transaction even though, in economic terms, they are being used to finance a single acquisition by the customer.

Schedule 7 to the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Scotland) Act 2013 provides relief to deal with that problem. It applies only to certain defined forms of alternative property finance.

What the official source says

The official guidance says that relief is available where one of three types of alternative property finance arrangement is used:

• a financial institution buys the property, then leases or sub-leases it to the customer, and agrees to transfer the property to the customer at the end of the term;
• a financial institution and the customer buy the property as owners in common; or
• a financial institution buys the property and then re-sells it to the customer, with the customer borrowing some or all of the price from that institution and granting a mortgage over the property.

The source also gives special definitions for this relief:

• “Financial institution” takes its meaning from section 564B of the Income Tax Act 2007, with one part of that definition omitted.
• “Arrangements” is defined very widely. It includes agreements, understandings, schemes, transactions, or a series of transactions, whether legally enforceable or not.
• References to a person include that person’s personal representatives after death.

The legislative basis is schedule 7 to the LBTT(S)A 2013, especially part 2 for the relief itself and part 5 for interpretation.

What this means in practice

The key practical point is that the relief is not a general exemption for any non-standard funding method. It is aimed at specific financing models set out in the legislation.

If a transaction falls within one of those models, the relief may stop LBTT arising more than once across the financing steps. That matters because, in these arrangements, the financial institution may temporarily acquire the property or an interest in it as part of the finance structure. Without relief, that could create multiple taxable land transactions even though the arrangement is intended to finance one acquisition by the customer.

The wide definition of “arrangements” is also important. It means the legislation looks at the whole structure, not just a single contract viewed in isolation. Informal understandings and linked steps may matter, even if every step is not contained in one enforceable document.

The definition of “financial institution” matters because the relief depends on the involvement of a qualifying institution. If the party providing the finance does not fall within the statutory definition, the relief may not apply even if the commercial effect looks similar.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach the issue is to ask the following questions:

• Is this an alternative property finance arrangement, or just an ordinary purchase funded by a normal mortgage?
• Does the structure fit one of the three categories listed in schedule 7?
• Is there a qualifying financial institution involved?
• What are all the steps in the wider arrangement, including any linked agreements or understandings?
• Which land transactions occur at each stage: the institution’s purchase, any lease or co-ownership step, any onward transfer, and any mortgage?
• Which of those transactions is the relief intended to protect from duplicate LBTT charges?

In practice, the analysis should follow the legal form of the arrangement as documented, but it should also take account of the wider statutory concept of “arrangements”. That means it is important to identify all connected steps from the outset.

The official guidance page is only an overview. The detailed conditions for each of the three categories sit in the linked sections dealing with each type of arrangement. So the fact that a structure broadly resembles one of the categories is not, by itself, enough to confirm relief.

Example

Illustration: a bank buys a property from a seller. Under the same overall arrangement, the bank leases the property to the customer and agrees that, at the end of the lease term, it will transfer the property to the customer. This is one of the types of arrangement identified in schedule 7. The purpose of the relief is to prevent LBTT being charged repeatedly simply because the finance structure requires the bank to acquire and later transfer the property as part of the funding model.

Whether relief actually applies, and to which transaction, depends on the detailed statutory conditions for that category.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The main difficulty is that these arrangements often involve several documents and several land transactions. It is easy to focus on one step, such as the institution’s purchase or the final transfer to the customer, and miss the fact that the legislation tests the whole arrangement.

Another difficulty is classification. Some financing structures may look commercially similar to the three listed models but may not match the statutory requirements closely enough. Reliefs in transaction taxes are usually applied by reference to the legislation’s exact conditions, not just by broad analogy.

The definition of “financial institution” can also be a technical point. If the finance provider is unusual, overseas, or operating through a structure that is not obviously within the statutory definition, that may need careful checking.

Finally, this overview page does not set out the detailed mechanics for each category. The practical outcome depends on the specific provisions for the relevant type of arrangement.

Key takeaways

• This relief is intended to stop LBTT being charged more than once where certain alternative property finance structures are used.
• The relief only applies to defined categories of arrangement involving a qualifying financial institution.
• You need to analyse the whole arrangement, not just one transaction in isolation, and then check the detailed rules for the relevant category.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Guide on LBTT Tax Relief for Alternative Property Finance Arrangements

View all LBTT Guidance Pages Here