Guidance on Chargeable Consideration for Lease Transactions Under LBTT

LBTT on leases: what counts as chargeable consideration

When working out LBTT on a lease, you must look beyond the stated rent. Tax can apply to rent, premiums and, in some cases, deposits or loans linked to the lease. Service charges are usually left out if they are clearly separate, but if payments are bundled together without a fair split, the whole amount may be treated as rent.

• Rent payable under the lease is chargeable consideration, and VAT on that rent is included if the landlord had opted to tax by the effective date.
• Premiums or grassums paid on the grant or assignation of a lease are taxed separately from rent under the non-residential rates and bands.
• Service charges are normally not chargeable if they are separately identified or can be apportioned on a just and reasonable basis.
• If a single payment covers rent and non-rent items and there is no proper apportionment, the full amount is treated as rent for LBTT.
• Variable or uncertain rent must be estimated reasonably at first, then revisited at review points; index-linked rent is treated differently from open market or contingent rent.
• Certain deposits or loans can count as chargeable consideration if repayment depends on tenant behaviour or death, unless a statutory exclusion applies.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

LBTT on leases: what counts as chargeable consideration

This page explains what counts as chargeable consideration for Land and Buildings Transaction Tax when a lease is granted or assigned. In practice, the main question is not just “what is the rent?”, but also whether other payments under or alongside the lease must be brought into the LBTT calculation. That matters because rent, premiums and certain deposits or loans are not all treated in the same way.

What this rule is about

For lease transactions, LBTT can apply to more than one type of payment. The legislation distinguishes between:

• rent payable under the lease,
• consideration other than rent, such as a premium, and
• in some cases, loans or deposits connected with the lease.

The practical issue is to identify what each payment really is for LBTT purposes. Labels in the lease help, but they are not always decisive. If a single undivided amount covers both chargeable and non-chargeable items, the tax treatment may be less favourable unless a just and reasonable apportionment can be made.

What the official source says

Revenue Scotland’s guidance says that rent payable under a lease is chargeable consideration for LBTT. For LBTT on leases, the relevant figure is the actual rent payable for each year of the term.

If consideration under a lease transaction wholly or partly consists of rent or other consideration, but is not apportioned, the whole amount is treated as rent. If an inclusive figure has to be split, the split must be made on a just and reasonable basis. That apportionment does not have to follow the lease wording if the documents do not reflect the true position for LBTT purposes.

Where the landlord has opted to tax for VAT by the effective date, VAT charged on the rent is included in the rent for LBTT purposes. A later option to tax does not alter the rent figure for the purposes of the three-year review.

The guidance also says that service charges are usually not rent and so are ordinarily not chargeable consideration, provided they are either:

• shown separately in the lease, or
• included within a single payment but then apportioned on a just and reasonable basis.

If there is a single sum for rent, or for rent plus service charge, and there is no proper apportionment or the service charge is not separately provided for, the whole sum is treated as rent for LBTT.

For variable or uncertain rent, a reasonable estimate of the rent for each year should be included in the LBTT return. Revenue Scotland says that where rent is subject to open market review, it will normally accept an estimate based on the previous rent. By contrast, rent linked only to RPI, CPI or a similar index is not treated as variable or uncertain rent for this purpose; the annual rent is taken as the annual rent, and the adjusted figure is then used at a lease review date such as a three-year review, assignation or termination.

If rent depends on a contingency, the calculation is made on the statutory assumption that the contingency will or will not occur, as the legislation requires. If the amount depends on an uncertain future event, a reasonable estimate is used. The guidance specifically mentions agricultural tenancy rent variation provisions as examples of uncertain or unascertained consideration.

The guidance further states that, because leases are revisited through the three-year review system, no repayment claim can be made to the extent the consideration consists of rent merely because a contingency does not happen or the amount later becomes known. It also states that LBTT on rent that is contingent or unascertained cannot be deferred.

For overlap periods where a further lease is granted in certain replacement situations, the rent during the overlap period is treated as paid under the old lease, not the new one. The rent under the new lease is reduced by the amount that would have been payable under the old lease during that overlap period, but not below nil.

As for consideration other than rent, a premium or grassum paid on the grant or assignation of a lease is chargeable consideration and is taxed using the standard rates and bands for non-residential property transactions. The guidance also notes that payment of the landlord’s reasonable fees in connection with the grant of a lease is not treated as a premium.

The guidance includes an example of a payment for exclusivity before the lease completes. It treats that payment as consideration for a right of pre-emption at first, and says it may initially be below the notifiable threshold. Once the lease is taken, the right becomes linked to the lease and LBTT becomes payable on that premium. It also notes a specific rule for non-residential leases: where the relevant rent is at least £1,000, the nil rate band does not apply to consideration other than rent.

Finally, certain loans or deposits connected with the grant or assignation of a lease are treated as chargeable consideration other than rent. This applies where repayment of all or part of the deposit or loan is contingent on something done or not done by the tenant or assignee, or on the tenant’s death. There is, however, an exclusion where the deposit does not exceed twice the relevant maximum rent. For a grant, the relevant maximum rent is the highest rent payable in any consecutive 12-month period during the term. For an assignation, it is the highest rent payable in any consecutive 12-month period during the remaining term.

What this means in practice

The starting point is to separate the payments into categories.

• Annual rent is taxed under the lease-rent rules.
• A premium is taxed separately as consideration other than rent.
• Service charge is usually left out, but only if it is genuinely distinct and properly identified.
• A deposit or loan may unexpectedly become chargeable if repayment depends on tenant behaviour and the statutory exclusion does not apply.

This means the drafting and the accounting detail matter. A lease that simply says the tenant will pay one annual amount for occupation and services may create an LBTT problem if there is no reliable basis for separating the service element. In that case, the whole amount may be treated as rent.

Variable rent also needs care. For the initial return, the tenant must use a reasonable estimate where the rent is not fixed. That is not the end of the story. Lease returns are revisited at the statutory review points, and the rent position is recalculated using actual figures where available and an updated estimate for the future.

Index-linked rent is treated differently from open-ended variable rent. If the lease says the rent changes only by reference to RPI, CPI or a similar index, Revenue Scotland does not treat that as variable or uncertain rent in the same way. The practical effect is that, at the review date, it is acceptable to use the current passing rent as the estimate for the remainder of the term.

Where a premium is paid as well as rent, both parts need to be considered. The premium does not disappear simply because it is connected with the lease rather than the freehold. And if the relevant non-residential rent is at least £1,000, the nil rate band is switched off for the premium element.

Deposits and loans are another trap area. Many lease deposits are simply security and may fall outside the charge if they are within the statutory limit. But if the repayment terms depend on the tenant’s conduct, and the amount exceeds twice the relevant maximum rent, the deposit or loan can be treated as chargeable consideration.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to analyse a lease for LBTT is to work through the payments in order.

• What amounts are payable for occupation of the property? Those are the starting point for rent.
• Are there separate service charges or other payments for services? If so, are they clearly identified and supported by the lease terms?
• If there is one inclusive figure, can it be split on a just and reasonable basis?
• Has VAT been charged on the rent because the landlord had opted to tax by the effective date?
• Is the rent fixed, open-market review based, turnover based, contingent, or uncertain?
• If the rent is uncertain, what is a reasonable estimate for each year?
• If the rent is index-linked only, what is the current annual rent and how will it be used at the next review date?
• Is there any lump sum, premium, grassum or payment for exclusivity or pre-emption linked to the lease?
• Has the tenant or assignee paid a deposit or made a loan, and do the repayment terms depend on tenant behaviour or death?
• Does the deposit exceed twice the relevant maximum rent?
• Is this a replacement lease situation where overlap period rules may reduce the rent treated as payable under the new lease?

That exercise should be done by reference to the actual legal obligations, not just the commercial description used by the parties.

Example

Illustration: a tenant takes a new non-residential lease. The lease provides for annual rent, a separately stated service charge, and a lump-sum premium on entry. The landlord had already opted to tax for VAT before the effective date.

For LBTT purposes:

• the rent includes any VAT charged on that rent,
• the service charge is ordinarily excluded because it is separately identified and is payment for services, and
• the premium is taxed as consideration other than rent.

If, instead, the lease had required one undivided annual payment covering both occupation and services, and there were no proper basis for apportionment, the whole annual amount could be treated as rent.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The difficult cases are usually not about the basic rule, but about classification and evidence.

First, a payment may have mixed features. A sum described commercially as “rent” may partly cover services. A payment described as a “deposit” may in substance be a chargeable amount if repayment is conditional in the way the legislation describes.

Second, the legislation and the guidance distinguish between different kinds of future rent movement. Open market review, indexation, turnover rent and contingent rent do not all work the same way. The correct treatment depends on exactly how the lease mechanism is drafted.

Third, the guidance accepts some practical estimating conventions, such as using the previous rent after an open market review or the current passing rent for the remaining term where rent varies only by RPI or CPI. That is helpful, but it still requires a careful reading of the lease to make sure the case really fits that description.

Fourth, overlap period rules for replacement leases are technical. They apply only in specified situations and can affect how much rent is treated as payable under the new lease. This is easy to miss if the transaction is viewed only as a straightforward regrant.

Finally, lease LBTT is not determined once and for all on day one. The three-year review system means the rent position may need to be revisited, and the legislation restricts repayment and deferral in relation to rent that is contingent or unascertained.

Key takeaways

• For lease LBTT, you must identify separately rent, premiums and any deposits or loans that may be treated as chargeable consideration.
• Service charges are usually excluded, but only if they are separately identified or can be apportioned on a just and reasonable basis.
• Variable, contingent and index-linked rent do not all follow the same rules, and lease review points can change the final LBTT position.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Guidance on Chargeable Consideration for Lease Transactions Under LBTT

View all LBTT Guidance Pages Here