Understanding SDLT Implications on Property Transfer During Company Liquidation with Shareowner Loans

SDLT when a company transfers property to a shareholder on winding up

HMRC says SDLT will not usually arise where a company in liquidation transfers property to a shareholder who originally lent the company the money to buy it, provided the transfer is simply a distribution on winding up and the shareholder does not assume a liability, release a debt as the price for the transfer, or give any other consideration.

• SDLT depends on whether there is chargeable consideration, not just on the fact that property is transferred.
• A shareholder loan secured on the property does not, by itself, mean SDLT is due when the property is distributed on liquidation.
• In HMRC’s example, no SDLT was argued because the shareholder did not take on anyone else’s debt and did not give value for the property.
• If the mortgage becomes irrelevant only because the lender and the property owner become the same person, that is not necessarily chargeable consideration.
• The position can change if the debt is released in return for the property, the shareholder assumes third-party borrowing, or the documents show wider consideration.
• This is a fact-sensitive area, and HMRC guidance is helpful but does not replace the need to test the actual facts against the legislation.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT on a property transferred to a shareholder on winding up where the shareholder originally funded the company

This page explains a narrow SDLT point that can arise when a company is wound up and its property is transferred to its shareholder. The source material deals with a case where the shareholder had previously lent money to the company to buy the property, and that loan was secured by a mortgage. The key question is whether the transfer on liquidation involves chargeable consideration for SDLT.

What this rule is about

SDLT is charged by reference to chargeable consideration. In property transactions, that is often money paid for the land, but it can also include non-cash consideration or the assumption of debt.

When a company is wound up and distributes property to a shareholder, it is important to identify why the property is being transferred and whether the shareholder is giving anything in return. If the shareholder takes the property subject to a debt, releases a debt, or otherwise assumes a liability, that may matter for SDLT. If not, there may be no chargeable consideration.

The source material looks at a particular fact pattern involving a shareholder loan used to buy the property. It addresses whether the existence of that loan and mortgage means SDLT should be charged when the property is transferred to the shareholder on winding up.

What the official source says

HMRC’s SDLT manual, quoting an extract from SDLT Technical News, says it would not argue that SDLT applies in the following example:

A owns the shares in B Ltd. A lends money to B Ltd so that B Ltd can buy a property. The loan is secured by a mortgage over the property. Later B Ltd is wound up and the property is transferred to A as beneficial owner of the equity. The reason for the transfer is the winding up. The loan is not released. The mortgage falls away in practical terms because the lender and the owner of the property are now the same person.

HMRC’s stated view is that, on those facts, A has not assumed any liability and has not given any other form of consideration. On that basis, HMRC says it would not seek to argue that the distribution in specie should bear SDLT.

What this means in practice

The practical point is that the mere existence of a shareholder loan secured on the property does not automatically create SDLT when the company transfers the property to the shareholder in a winding up.

What matters is whether the shareholder gives chargeable consideration for the transfer. In HMRC’s example, the answer is no. The shareholder already owned the debt. The transfer happens because the company is being wound up and the shareholder is entitled to the remaining equity. The loan is not being released as the price for the transfer, and the shareholder is not taking on someone else’s liability. Because there is no assumption of debt and no other consideration, HMRC says it would not seek to charge SDLT.

This is a useful distinction. A transfer of land subject to debt can often trigger SDLT, but that depends on the transferee actually assuming or giving value in connection with the transfer. If the debt and the ownership of the land simply come together in the same person as a consequence of the liquidation, that is not necessarily the same thing.

How to analyse it

When looking at a transfer of property on winding up, ask these questions:

• Why is the property being transferred? Is it being distributed because of the winding up, rather than sold?
• Is the shareholder paying money or transferring anything of value for the property?
• Is any debt being released, satisfied, or compromised as part of the transfer?
• Is the shareholder actually assuming a liability that previously belonged to the company?
• Does the mortgage disappear only because the lender and the owner become the same person, rather than because the debt is released as consideration?

The source material supports a no-SDLT analysis only where the transfer is truly a distribution on winding up and the shareholder has not assumed liability or provided other consideration.

It is also important to separate three different ideas:

• The company owes money to the shareholder.
• The property is charged as security for that debt.
• The property is later distributed to the shareholder on liquidation.

Those facts do not, by themselves, mean there is chargeable consideration. The crucial issue is whether the transfer itself involves consideration.

Example

A owns all the shares in X Ltd. A lends X Ltd funds to buy a commercial property, and X Ltd grants A a mortgage over that property as security. A few years later X Ltd is wound up. The liquidator transfers the property to A as part of the winding up. The loan is not formally released in return for the transfer. Instead, after the transfer, the security no longer has practical significance because A is both lender and owner of the property.

On the basis of HMRC’s published view in the source material, HMRC would not seek to argue that SDLT is due in that situation, because A has not assumed a liability and has not given other consideration for the transfer.

Why this can be difficult in practice

This area is fact-sensitive. The source material is short and deals with one example only. It does not say that every transfer on winding up is outside SDLT, and it does not remove the need to examine whether consideration is present in a particular case.

Difficulties can arise if the documentation suggests that the debt is being released in exchange for the property, or if the shareholder takes the property subject to borrowing owed to someone else, or if there are wider arrangements that alter the economic position. In those cases, the analysis may be different.

Another source of confusion is the language of mortgages and liabilities. A mortgage over land does not always mean the transferee has assumed debt for SDLT purposes. The legal and practical effect of the transfer has to be examined carefully.

The source is also HMRC guidance rather than legislation. That makes it useful evidence of HMRC’s view, but the legal question remains whether there is chargeable consideration under the legislation on the actual facts.

Key takeaways

• A property distributed to a shareholder on winding up is not automatically subject to SDLT just because the property was originally financed by a shareholder loan.
• On HMRC’s published view, there is no SDLT in the example given because the shareholder does not assume liability and gives no other consideration.
• The outcome depends on the real effect of the transaction, especially whether any debt is assumed, released, or otherwise used as consideration for the transfer.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Understanding SDLT Implications on Property Transfer During Company Liquidation with Shareowner Loans

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here