Relief for Multiple Dwellings in Partnership Transactions Ending June 2024

Multiple Dwellings Relief and partnership transactions

Multiple Dwellings Relief (MDR) did not apply to certain SDLT partnership transactions, even before the relief was abolished for most transactions from 1 June 2024. If SDLT arises only because the special partnership rules in Schedule 15 to Finance Act 2003 treat an event as a land transaction, that deemed transaction cannot qualify for MDR.

  • MDR was excluded for certain transfers of partnership interests, acquisitions of partnership interests, and withdrawals of money or value from a partnership where Schedule 15 deems them to be land transactions.
  • The fact that a partnership owns several dwellings does not by itself make a partnership transaction eligible for MDR.
  • The key issue is the legal nature of the SDLT chargeable event, not the economic effect or the number of residential properties involved.
  • When reviewing a case, first check whether SDLT is charged under the special partnership code rather than under an ordinary transfer of land.
  • This exclusion is now mainly relevant to transactions before 1 June 2024, or to cases where MDR is still preserved by transitional rules.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

Nick Garner

Need an indemnified letter of advice? Email me your situation — my initial assessment is always free. If a formal letter is needed, fixed fee from £350, no VAT.

✉️ [email protected]

Insured by Markel International (up to £250k per claim). Learn more →

Multiple Dwellings Relief and partnership transactions

This page explains an important limit on Multiple Dwellings Relief (MDR) in SDLT. Even before MDR was abolished for most transactions from 1 June 2024, certain partnership-related transactions were excluded from the relief. The practical point is that not every transaction connected with dwellings can qualify for MDR. If the transaction is treated as a land transaction only because of the special partnership rules in Schedule 15 to Finance Act 2003, MDR is not available.

What this rule is about

SDLT has special rules for partnerships. Those rules can treat certain changes in partnership interests, acquisitions of partnership interests, or withdrawals of money or other value from a partnership as if they were land transactions.

MDR was a relief that could apply where a transaction involved more than one dwelling. But the relief did not apply to every transaction that happened to involve residential property. The rule covered here is a specific exclusion for some partnership transactions.

This matters because partnership transactions can involve land indirectly rather than by a straightforward sale of property. The legislation treats some of those dealings as land transactions for SDLT purposes, but that does not mean they qualify for MDR.

What the official source says

The HMRC manual says that the following cannot be a “relevant transaction” for MDR purposes:

  • a transfer of a partnership interest that is deemed to be a land transaction under Schedule 15, paragraphs 14 or 17, Finance Act 2003;
  • an acquisition of a partnership interest that is treated under Schedule 15, paragraph 16, as a major interest in land;
  • a withdrawal of money or other value from a partnership that is deemed to be a land transaction under Schedule 15, paragraph 17A.

In other words, where SDLT applies because the special partnership code deems the event to be a land transaction, that deemed transaction is outside MDR.

The source also notes that MDR has been abolished for transactions completing, or substantially performed, on or after 1 June 2024, subject to transitional rules. So this exclusion is mainly relevant for earlier transactions, or for transactions that fall within those transitional provisions.

What this means in practice

The key practical question is not simply whether dwellings are involved. It is whether the transaction for SDLT purposes is one of the specific partnership transactions created by Schedule 15.

If it is, MDR cannot apply to that transaction.

This is so even if:

  • the partnership property includes multiple dwellings;
  • the economic effect resembles an acquisition or disposal of residential property; or
  • the transaction would otherwise look similar to a purchase of more than one dwelling.

The reason is that MDR depended on there being a “relevant transaction” for the relief, and the manual states that these deemed partnership transactions are not relevant transactions for that purpose.

So, for example, a person acquiring a partnership interest in a property-holding partnership should not assume that MDR is available just because the partnership owns several dwellings. The SDLT treatment of the acquisition may arise under the partnership code, and if it does, this exclusion prevents MDR from applying.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach the issue is:

  • Identify the actual chargeable event for SDLT purposes.
  • Ask whether SDLT is arising under the special partnership rules in Schedule 15 to Finance Act 2003, rather than under an ordinary conveyance or transfer of land.
  • Check whether the transaction falls within one of the categories mentioned by HMRC: transfer of a partnership interest, acquisition of a partnership interest treated as a major interest in land, or withdrawal from a partnership treated as a land transaction.
  • If it does, treat MDR as unavailable for that transaction.
  • Then consider separately whether any other transaction in the wider arrangement is a different land transaction with its own SDLT treatment. The exclusion applies to the partnership transaction identified by the source material; it does not automatically answer every SDLT question arising elsewhere in the facts.

This distinction matters because partnership arrangements can produce more than one tax issue. A reader should be careful not to blur together:

  • the underlying ownership of dwellings by the partnership, and
  • the deemed land transaction created by the partnership legislation.

Example

Illustration: A property investment partnership owns several residential flats. One partner increases their stake by acquiring part of another partner’s partnership interest. Under the partnership rules, that acquisition is treated for SDLT purposes in the way described in Schedule 15. Even though the partnership assets include multiple dwellings, the deemed partnership transaction is not a relevant transaction for MDR. The presence of several flats does not, by itself, bring MDR back into point.

Why this can be difficult in practice

Partnership SDLT rules are technical, and the tax result often depends on deemed transactions rather than ordinary property transfers. That creates two common problems.

First, it is easy to focus on the property and miss the legal character of the transaction. A person may think, “I am effectively acquiring an interest in several dwellings,” but the SDLT rules may instead treat the event as a partnership transaction under Schedule 15. If so, this exclusion becomes critical.

Second, the source is narrow. It tells you that certain partnership transactions cannot qualify for MDR, but it does not by itself explain the full operation of Schedule 15 or every possible factual variation. The exact paragraph engaged, and whether the transaction is in fact one of the deemed land transactions listed, may require careful analysis of the partnership structure and the steps taken.

There is also a timing issue. Because MDR has been abolished for transactions completing, or substantially performed, on or after 1 June 2024, the first question in many cases will now be whether MDR is in point at all. If it is not preserved by the transitional rules, the partnership exclusion may no longer matter because the relief itself is unavailable.

Key takeaways

  • Certain SDLT partnership transactions are specifically excluded from MDR.
  • The fact that a partnership owns multiple dwellings does not mean a transfer or acquisition of a partnership interest can qualify for MDR.
  • For post-1 June 2024 transactions, check first whether MDR is available at all, taking account of the abolition of the relief and any transitional rules.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Relief for Multiple Dwellings in Partnership Transactions Ending June 2024

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here

Search Land Tax Advice with Google



£350
NO VAT
— Indemnified Letter of Advice
Fixed fee £350 for most letters. Complex cases up to £1,250 — always quoted in advance. Insured by Markel International up to £250,000 per claim.

Nick Garner

Conveyancer holding things up until they have written SDLT advice? I’ll provide a formal, insured opinion from an HMRC-registered tax agent so they can proceed.

How it works

“`

1

Email me the details of your situation. I’ll reply in writing — free of charge — with a clear explanation of your legal position.

2

You decide whether that’s enough. Often the free email is all you need — you can forward it to your solicitor for their own assessment.

3

If a formal letter is needed, we go from there. I’ll quote you a fixed fee before any paid work begins.

“`

Start with step 1. No commitment, no cost — just email me your situation and I’ll clarify the legal position.

✉️ Email: [email protected]