Understanding Lease Surrender and Regrant Rules for Stamp Duty Land Tax

SDLT treatment of lease surrenders and regrants

When an existing lease is surrendered and a new lease is granted between the same parties, SDLT generally ignores the surrender and the new lease as consideration for each other. This helps prevent an artificial SDLT charge, but any separate payment, rent, premium or other chargeable consideration must still be considered.

• The rule applies where one or more old leases are surrendered and one or more new leases are granted between the same parties.
• It can apply to the same premises, different premises, part only of the original property, and deemed surrender and regrant cases.
• If the parties are not exactly the same on both sides of the surrender and regrant, HMRC says the rule does not apply.
• Separate payments, such as a landlord paying a tenant to secure the surrender, may still be chargeable to SDLT.
• HMRC distinguishes between a cash payment for the surrender, which may be chargeable, and the release of the tenant’s obligations, which it says is not chargeable consideration for the surrender.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT and lease surrenders: when a surrender and a regrant are ignored as consideration for each other

This page explains a specific SDLT rule that applies when an existing lease is surrendered and a new lease is granted between the same parties. The rule matters because, without it, there could be an argument that each transaction is consideration for the other. HMRC’s guidance says that, in these circumstances, SDLT generally ignores the surrender as consideration for the new lease, and ignores the new lease as consideration for the surrender.

What this rule is about

SDLT is charged by reference to chargeable consideration. In lease restructuring cases, a landlord and tenant may agree that the tenant gives up an existing lease and receives a new one instead. That can happen for the same premises, different premises, or only part of the original premises.

The legal issue is whether the surrender of the old lease counts as consideration for the grant of the new lease, and whether the grant of the new lease counts as consideration for the surrender. If both were treated as consideration, the SDLT analysis could become distorted or produce charges that do not reflect the real economic deal.

Schedule 17A paragraph 16 Finance Act 2003 deals with this point. HMRC’s manual explains how it applies.

What the official source says

According to HMRC’s manual, where one or more new leases are granted in consideration of the surrender of one or more existing leases, and the transactions are between the same parties:

• the grant of the new lease is not treated as chargeable consideration for the surrender, and
• the surrender is not treated as chargeable consideration for the grant of the new lease.

HMRC says this applies whether the old and new leases relate to the same premises or different premises.

The manual also says the rule still applies even if there is other consideration for the surrender. An example given is a payment by the landlord to the tenant to procure the surrender. HMRC states that such a payment is itself chargeable to SDLT. By contrast, the release of a tenant’s obligations is not chargeable consideration for the surrender of the lease.

HMRC also treats the surrender of part only of the property subject to a lease as a surrender of a lease for these purposes.

The same approach applies where SDLT treats the arrangements as a deemed surrender and regrant.

However, HMRC makes clear that the rule only applies where the surrender and the regrant are between the same parties. The manual gives the example that A surrendering to B, followed by B granting to A and C jointly, does not meet the condition.

What this means in practice

If a tenant gives up an old lease and receives a new lease from the same landlord, you do not automatically bring the surrendered lease into the SDLT consideration for the new lease. Equally, you do not treat the new lease as consideration for the surrender.

That does not mean there is no SDLT issue at all. It means you must identify what consideration actually remains relevant once this rule has switched off the surrender/regrant cross-consideration.

In practice, that usually means asking:

• Is there any premium, reverse premium, rent, or other money payment?
• Is the payment made for the surrender, for the new lease, or for both?
• Are the parties exactly the same on both sides of the surrender and the regrant?
• Is this a full surrender, a partial surrender, or a deemed surrender and regrant?

The rule can therefore be very important in lease variations, re-gears, renewals, and restructuring arrangements. It narrows the SDLT consideration analysis to the amounts or obligations that the legislation still treats as chargeable consideration.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to analyse the transaction is as follows.

1. Identify the two linked transactions.

   Is there an existing lease being surrendered and a new lease being granted? There may be more than one old lease or more than one new lease.

2. Check whether the parties are the same.

   This is critical. HMRC’s view is that the rule only applies where the surrender and regrant are between the same parties in opposite directions. If an extra tenant, landlord, or other party is introduced on the regrant, the rule does not apply.

3. Check whether the arrangement includes only part of the original premises.

   HMRC says a partial surrender is still treated as a surrender of a lease for this purpose, so the rule can still apply.

4. Consider whether SDLT deems there to be a surrender and regrant.

   The manual says the same rule applies to deemed surrender and regrant cases, not just express ones.

5. Strip out the surrender/regrant as consideration for each other.

   If the conditions are met, do not treat the old lease as consideration for the new lease, and do not treat the new lease as consideration for the surrender.

6. Then identify any other consideration that remains chargeable.

   For example, if the landlord pays the tenant to secure the surrender, HMRC says that payment is itself chargeable to SDLT. But HMRC also says that the release of the tenant’s obligations is not chargeable consideration for the surrender.

Example

Illustration: A tenant holds a lease of office space from a landlord. The parties agree that the tenant will surrender part of the existing leased area and take a new lease of the retained area on different terms. The landlord also pays the tenant a sum to secure the deal.

On HMRC’s approach, the partial surrender is treated as a surrender of a lease for these purposes. If the surrender and the new lease are between the same parties, the surrender is not treated as chargeable consideration for the new lease, and the new lease is not treated as chargeable consideration for the surrender.

However, the separate payment by the landlord to the tenant to procure the surrender is not ignored by this rule. HMRC says that payment is itself chargeable to SDLT. The analysis therefore focuses on that payment and any other relevant consideration, rather than treating the surrender and regrant themselves as consideration for each other.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The main difficulty is identifying exactly what the parties have done, and whether the statutory conditions are truly met.

First, the “same parties” requirement can be easy to overlook. Many lease restructurings involve guarantors, group companies, additional tenants, or changes in legal ownership. HMRC’s guidance suggests that introducing another party on the regrant takes the case outside this rule.

Second, transactions are often documented as a package. A surrender, a new lease, a variation, a payment, and releases of obligations may all happen together. The SDLT treatment depends on separating out which elements count as chargeable consideration and which do not.

Third, deemed surrender and regrant cases can be especially technical. The manual says the rule applies, but working out whether there is in fact a deemed surrender and regrant requires a separate SDLT analysis.

Fourth, the manual distinguishes between a landlord’s payment to procure a surrender, which HMRC says is chargeable, and the release of the tenant’s obligations, which HMRC says is not chargeable consideration for the surrender. That distinction can matter where the commercial documents use broad language about compensation, waiver, or release.

Finally, this is an HMRC manual statement explaining how HMRC applies Finance Act 2003 Schedule 17A paragraph 16. The legislation remains the primary source. In unusual fact patterns, careful attention is needed to the exact statutory wording and to the legal form of the transactions.

Key takeaways

• Where a lease is surrendered and a new lease is granted between the same parties, SDLT generally does not treat each as consideration for the other.
• That does not remove SDLT from the picture entirely; separate payments or other chargeable consideration still need to be identified.
• The rule is fact-sensitive, especially where there is a partial surrender, a deemed surrender and regrant, or any change in the parties.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Understanding Lease Surrender and Regrant Rules for Stamp Duty Land Tax

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here