Assents and Appropriations by Personal Representatives: SDLT Chargeability Examples Explained

When inherited property is exempt from SDLT

Property transferred from a deceased person’s estate to a beneficiary is often exempt from Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT), but the exemption can be lost if the beneficiary gives money or anything of value in return. The main question is whether the property is simply being inherited as part of the estate administration, or whether the beneficiary is effectively paying for it.

• A transfer by executors or administrators to a beneficiary is usually exempt if the beneficiary is just receiving what they are entitled to under the will or intestacy.
• The exemption can also apply where a beneficiary entitled to cash accepts a property instead, even partly, in satisfaction of that entitlement.
• If the beneficiary gives chargeable consideration, such as cash, an IOU, an assumed debt, or a charge over the property to secure payment, SDLT may be due.
• An existing mortgage already on the property at the date of death does not, on the examples given, by itself stop the exemption from applying.
• Changing the legal steps does not necessarily change the SDLT result: SDLT can still arise whether the debt is created directly by the beneficiary or first by the executors and then taken on by the beneficiary.
• In practice, the key issue is substance rather than labels: if one beneficiary takes the property and gives value to compensate another person’s entitlement, the transfer may no longer be exempt.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

When an inheritance of property is exempt from SDLT, and when it is not

This page explains how Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) applies when personal representatives transfer property from a deceased person’s estate. The key point is that many transfers of inherited property are exempt, but that exemption can be lost if the beneficiary gives something in return for the property. In practice, the difficult question is often whether the beneficiary has provided chargeable consideration.

What this rule is about

When someone dies, their executors or administrators may transfer land or property out of the estate to a beneficiary. That transfer is often made by an assent, or by an appropriation followed by transfer.

The legislation referred to in the source gives an exemption from SDLT for certain assents and appropriations by personal representatives. But the exemption does not protect a transaction if the beneficiary is effectively paying for the property, or giving something of value in exchange for it.

So the real issue is not simply whether the property comes from an estate. The issue is whether the beneficiary receives it as part of the administration of the estate without giving chargeable consideration, or whether the beneficiary gives money or money’s worth for it.

What the official source says

The official examples show a clear distinction.

If a property is left directly to a beneficiary under the will, the transfer is exempt from SDLT. The same applies if a beneficiary entitled to cash instead accepts a property in satisfaction, or part satisfaction, of that entitlement. The source also says that this remains exempt even if the property is subject to a mortgage that was already in place at death and is not paid off by the estate.

By contrast, SDLT can arise if the beneficiary gives value in order to take the property. The examples treat an acknowledgement of indebtedness for £250,000 as money’s worth. That means the beneficiary has given chargeable consideration of £250,000, so SDLT is charged on that amount.

The same result follows where the executors first acknowledge the debt and the beneficiary then takes the property subject to liability for that debt. In that case the source says the beneficiary gives chargeable consideration by assuming an existing liability.

The final example shows that it is not necessary for the beneficiary to promise to pay personally in all circumstances. If the beneficiary charges the property with payment of £250,000, and the trustees can only enforce against the property, that still counts as money’s worth and therefore as chargeable consideration.

What this means in practice

In straightforward inheritance cases, SDLT is usually not the problem. If the beneficiary simply receives what the will gives them, or receives estate property in satisfaction of an entitlement under the estate, the transfer is generally within the exemption described in the source.

The position changes if the beneficiary takes the property on terms that involve compensating someone else in the estate structure. That compensation may not look like a normal purchase price, but it can still be chargeable consideration.

The examples are particularly important where one beneficiary takes a property and another beneficiary or trust is instead given a financial entitlement. If the person taking the property gives an IOU, assumes a debt, or charges the property to secure payment to the other beneficiary, the transfer may no longer be exempt in practice.

The source also makes an important practical point about mortgages. A mortgage already attached to the property at death does not, by itself, prevent the exemption in the examples given. The source treats the transfer as exempt even though the property remains mortgaged and the mortgage is not paid off on death.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach these cases is to ask the following questions.

• Is the property being transferred by personal representatives as part of administering the estate?
• Is the beneficiary simply receiving what they are entitled to under the will or intestacy, or are they giving something in return?
• If the beneficiary is not entitled to that exact property, are they accepting it in satisfaction of an existing entitlement under the estate, such as a cash legacy?
• Has the beneficiary given money, assumed a debt, acknowledged indebtedness, or charged the property to secure payment to someone else?
• If there is a mortgage, was it already on the property at death, and is the case otherwise within the type of exempt transfer shown in the examples?

The central question is whether there is chargeable consideration. The examples show that consideration can take forms other than cash. An obligation to pay, or a secured obligation attached to the property, may be enough.

Example

Suppose a will gives £250,000 to trustees of a discretionary trust and leaves the residue of the estate to the deceased’s child. The only estate asset is a house.

If the child takes the whole house and, in return, acknowledges that they owe the trustees £250,000, the source treats that acknowledgement as money’s worth. The child has therefore given chargeable consideration of £250,000, and SDLT is charged on that amount.

But if the house had simply been specifically left to the child under the will, with no separate obligation given by the child in return, the transfer would be exempt under the example in the source.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The hard cases are not usually about the basic exemption. They are about whether the arrangements amount to the beneficiary giving value for the property.

That can be easy to miss because the transaction may still feel like an inheritance rather than a purchase. But SDLT looks at substance, not just labels. If one person takes the land and another person’s entitlement is replaced by a debt, secured payment, or other thing of value given by the person taking the land, that may amount to chargeable consideration.

Another point that can cause confusion is the role of mortgages. The source examples say that an existing mortgage not paid off on death does not stop the exemption in the situations described. That should not be read more broadly than the examples support. The source is illustrating these estate administration cases, not laying down a universal rule for every transfer involving debt.

It is also important to keep separate the different legal steps in the administration. The examples show that SDLT can still arise whether the debt is acknowledged directly by the beneficiary or first by the executors and then assumed by the beneficiary. So changing the mechanics does not necessarily change the SDLT result.

Key takeaways

• A simple transfer of inherited property by personal representatives is often exempt from SDLT.
• The exemption can be lost if the beneficiary gives money or money’s worth for the property, including by acknowledging or assuming a debt.
• An existing mortgage on the property at death does not, on the source examples, by itself prevent the exemption in an otherwise exempt assent or appropriation.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Assents and Appropriations by Personal Representatives: SDLT Chargeability Examples Explained

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here