Chargeable Consideration: Premium Payments and Reverse Premiums for Leases

SDLT on Lease Premiums and Reverse Premiums

HMRC’s guidance shows that Stamp Duty Land Tax on leases is not just about rent. You also need to consider lump-sum payments linked to the lease, including premiums paid by a tenant and reverse premiums paid by a landlord, because each may have different SDLT treatment.

• Lease premiums and reverse premiums are treated by HMRC as separate topics within the rules on chargeable consideration.
• A lump sum paid by a tenant for the grant of a lease may count as chargeable consideration for SDLT, in addition to any rent.
• If money is paid by the landlord to the tenant or incoming occupier, it may be a reverse premium and needs separate analysis.
• The wording used in heads of terms or lease documents is relevant, but the true legal and commercial substance of the payment matters more.
• When reviewing a lease transaction, identify the land transaction, list all payments and benefits, separate rent from lump sums, and check what each payment is really for.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT and lease premiums: what this part of the guidance covers

This page is about a very specific part of Stamp Duty Land Tax: payments described as premiums in lease transactions. The source material here is only a contents page, so it does not set out the detailed rules itself. What it does show is that the official guidance separates two issues: premiums paid for a lease, and reverse premiums. That distinction matters because the SDLT treatment can differ depending on who pays whom, and why.

What this rule is about

When a lease is granted, the tax position is not limited to the rent. SDLT can also apply to other forms of chargeable consideration connected with the grant of the lease. One common example is a premium: a lump sum paid in connection with the lease.

The source material also points to reverse premiums. In broad terms, that label is used where money moves in the opposite direction from what many people expect in a lease transaction. Instead of the tenant paying a premium to the landlord, the landlord may pay an amount to the tenant or incoming occupier. The tax consequences of that kind of payment need separate analysis.

What the official source says

The official material provided is a contents entry within HMRC’s SDLT manual under chargeable consideration. It identifies two sub-topics:

• premium payments for a lease
• reverse premiums

That tells you two important things about HMRC’s approach:

• payments called premiums are being considered as part of the wider rules on chargeable consideration
• reverse premiums are not treated as the same issue and require separate consideration

The contents page itself does not state the substantive rule, thresholds, exemptions, or computational method. Those points would need to be taken from the linked detailed pages or from the legislation.

What this means in practice

If you are looking at SDLT on a lease, you should not focus only on the annual rent. You should also ask whether any lump-sum payment is being made in connection with the lease, and in which direction that payment flows.

In practice, the main questions are usually:

• Is there a premium being paid for the grant, assignment, variation, or surrender of a lease?
• Who is paying it?
• Is the payment part of the consideration for the land transaction, or is it something else?
• Is the amount genuinely a premium, or is it being described that way when it is really rent, an inducement, a contribution, or consideration for another obligation?

These questions matter because SDLT applies to chargeable consideration for a land transaction. A payment may affect the SDLT analysis if it forms part of that consideration. But not every payment made around the same time as a lease transaction is necessarily taxed in the same way.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach this issue is:

• Identify the land transaction. For example, is this the grant of a new lease?
• List every payment and non-cash benefit connected with the transaction.
• Separate rent from lump-sum payments.
• Check whether a lump-sum payment is being made by the tenant to obtain the lease. If so, it may be a premium and may fall within chargeable consideration.
• Check whether money is instead being paid by the landlord to the tenant or incoming occupier. If so, it may be a reverse premium, which needs separate treatment rather than being assumed to follow the normal premium rules.
• Review the contractual documents carefully. Labels used in heads of terms or leases are relevant, but they are not always decisive if the legal substance is different.

It is also important to keep the wider SDLT framework in mind. Lease transactions can involve more than one type of consideration at the same time. A transaction may involve rent, a premium, other obligations, or payments linked to separate agreements. The tax analysis depends on what the payment is really for.

Example

Illustration: a tenant takes a new commercial lease and pays a lump sum on completion in addition to the yearly rent. The first question is whether that lump sum is consideration for the grant of the lease. If it is, it may be treated as a lease premium for SDLT purposes and cannot simply be ignored because rent is also being paid.

By contrast, if a landlord pays money to an incoming tenant to encourage it to take space in a difficult market, that raises a different issue. The payment is not a standard premium paid by the tenant for the lease. It would need to be analysed under the separate guidance on reverse premiums.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The source material here is only a signpost, so it does not resolve the harder cases. In real transactions, difficulty often arises because:

• the documents use commercial labels that do not match the legal substance
• several payments are made under linked agreements at the same time
• part of a payment may relate to the lease and part may relate to something else, such as fit-out works, settlement of liabilities, or other commercial arrangements
• the direction of payment may suggest a reverse premium, but the surrounding facts may still need careful analysis

That is why the right starting point is to identify exactly what the payment is for, rather than relying only on the word premium.

Key takeaways

• HMRC treats lease premiums and reverse premiums as separate SDLT topics within chargeable consideration.
• In lease transactions, do not look only at rent; check all lump-sum payments and who makes them.
• The label used in the documents is not always enough; the SDLT treatment depends on the true nature of the payment.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Chargeable Consideration: Premium Payments and Reverse Premiums for Leases

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here