Overview of Linked Leases and Stamp Duty Land Tax Treatment

When lease transactions are linked for SDLT

For SDLT, two or more lease transactions may be linked, but the tax treatment depends on why they are linked. The main distinction is between successive leases of the same premises and leases agreed as part of one overall bargain. A renewal is not always linked if it was genuinely renegotiated at arm’s length and there is proper evidence of that.

• Successive linked leases usually involve the same premises, the same or connected parties, and one lease starting immediately after the other.
• A renewal may be linked where the new rent was fixed under the earlier lease or simply continues the earlier rent basis.
• A renewal may not be linked if the earlier lease expired naturally, there was no right or obligation to renew, and the new lease was negotiated afresh on arm’s length terms.
• Some transactions are linked but excluded from the special successive-lease rules, including certain pre-1 December 2003 leases and some agreements for lease substantially performed on or after 19 July 2006.
• Where leases of two or more properties are negotiated as one package deal, the general linked-transaction rules may apply and the consideration may be aggregated for SDLT.
• The analysis is fact-sensitive and can also cover transactions treated as lease grants for SDLT, such as certain deemed new leases.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

When leases are linked for SDLT: successive leases and single bargains

This page explains when two or more lease transactions are treated as “linked” for stamp duty land tax, and why that matters. The key point is that linked leases are not always taxed in the same way. The SDLT result depends on whether the leases are part of one overall bargain, or whether they are successive leases of the same premises taking effect one after another.

What this rule is about

SDLT has special rules for “linked transactions”. Under the legislation, transactions are linked if they form either a single scheme or arrangement, or a series of transactions, between the same parties or connected persons.

For leases, that broad idea of linkage matters because there are two different tax treatments:

• one for successive leases, typically where one lease follows another over the same premises, and
• another for leases that are linked because they were negotiated as part of a single bargain.

The distinction is important because you do not simply ask whether the leases are linked. You must also ask what kind of linkage it is. That determines how SDLT is calculated.

What the official source says

The source says that lease transactions can be linked in two main ways.

First, there are successive leases. These commonly arise where a lease is renewed between the same landlord and tenant. HMRC says a renewal lease will be treated as linked with the original lease if, for example, the rent was fixed under the original lease or the new lease says the rent is the same as under the earlier lease.

But a renewal will not be treated as linked at all if it can be shown, with appropriate evidence, that it was negotiated at arm’s length. The source gives examples of that, including where the earlier lease:

• expired naturally,
• did not contain any right or obligation to renew, and/or
• was followed by entirely new negotiations, as if the tenant were a new tenant.

Apart from that arm’s length exception, leases of the same premises are treated as successive linked leases where they are:

• between the same or connected parties,
• granted to take effect one immediately after the other,
• whether granted at the same time or not.

The source also says that this special successive-lease treatment does not apply in certain cases, including:

• where the earlier transaction was before SDLT began on 1 December 2003, and
• where there was an agreement for lease that was substantially performed on or after 19 July 2006, followed by the grant of the lease in pursuance of that agreement.

Those transactions may still be linked, but not as successive leases. In those cases, tax is calculated under the general linked-lease rules instead.

Second, there are leases linked as a single scheme or arrangement. The source says that where leases of two or more properties are negotiated as a single bargain between the same or connected parties, they are linked for SDLT. If the special successive-lease rules do not apply, the chargeable consideration is aggregated when applying SDLT rates and thresholds.

The source says this general linked-lease treatment also applies to:

• pre-SDLT leases linked with SDLT leases,
• agreements for lease substantially performed on or after 19 July 2006 and followed by grant, and
• certain deemed new leases arising from rent increases in the first five years, but only where the deemed lease is in fact linked with the original lease.

The source adds that, for these purposes, “leases” includes transactions treated as the grant of a lease for SDLT.

What this means in practice

If you are looking at more than one lease transaction, the first practical question is not just “are they linked?” but “what is the relationship between them?”

That matters because the SDLT calculation changes depending on the answer.

In broad terms:

• if one lease of the same premises follows another immediately, between the same or connected parties, the special rules for successive linked leases may apply;
• if several leases were negotiated together as one overall deal, the general linked-transaction rules may apply instead;
• some transactions may be linked, but specifically excluded from the successive-lease treatment, so they fall back into the general linked-lease rules.

For a tenant and conveyancer, this affects how SDLT is computed and whether amounts under separate lease transactions are brought together. For a landlord and adviser, it affects how a renewal, regrant, agreement for lease, or package of lettings should be analysed before returns are filed.

The source also shows that not every lease renewal is automatically linked. If the renewal really results from fresh arm’s length negotiation, and that can be evidenced, it may be treated as a separate transaction for SDLT rather than as linked with the earlier lease.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach the issue is to work through the following questions.

1. Are the transactions between the same parties or connected persons?

Linked transaction rules require that connection. If the parties are different and not connected, the starting point for linkage may fail.

2. Are you dealing with the same premises, one lease after another?

If yes, consider the successive-lease rules first. The source points to leases of the same premises taking effect immediately after one another as the core case.

3. Is the later lease really a renewal, or is it a genuinely new deal?

Look at the facts. Indicators of linkage include rent fixed by the earlier lease terms, or a new lease expressly continuing the same rent basis. Indicators against linkage include natural expiry, no renewal right or obligation, and entirely fresh negotiation on arm’s length terms.

4. Is there evidence of arm’s length renegotiation?

The source expressly says this must be shown with appropriate evidence. In practice, that means contemporaneous material matters. The question is whether the new lease was negotiated as if the tenant were new, rather than flowing from the earlier arrangement.

5. Does a special exclusion apply?

Even if transactions are linked, the successive-lease rules do not apply to every linked pair. The source identifies at least two important exclusions:

• an earlier pre-1 December 2003 transaction, and
• an agreement for lease substantially performed on or after 19 July 2006, followed by the grant of the lease.

In those cases, you may still have linked transactions, but not successive linked leases.

6. Were multiple leases negotiated as one overall bargain?

If leases of two or more properties were agreed as part of a single bargain, they may be linked under the single scheme or arrangement rules. This is a factual question. The issue is whether the transactions were really parts of one deal.

7. Is any transaction only treated as a lease for SDLT purposes?

The source makes clear that the rules are not limited to actual lease grants. They can also apply to transactions that SDLT treats as lease grants, such as certain deemed new leases.

Example

Illustration: a tenant takes a five-year lease of a shop. Before it ends, the parties agree a further lease of the same shop to begin immediately after the first one ends. The new lease uses the rent mechanism already fixed under the original lease. On the source material, that is the kind of case likely to be treated as a successive linked lease.

By contrast, suppose the first lease simply expires, there was no right or obligation to renew, the landlord markets the property, and the tenant then negotiates a fresh lease on entirely new terms in the same way as any outside bidder. If there is evidence of that fresh arm’s length process, the source indicates the renewal would not be treated as linked with the original lease for SDLT purposes.

A different example is where a landlord and tenant agree leases of several separate units in one building as part of one package deal. Even if these are not successive leases of the same premises, they may still be linked because they were negotiated as a single bargain.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The difficult part is usually classification.

First, the line between a renewal and a genuinely fresh letting can be fact-sensitive. The source gives examples, not an exhaustive test. Real cases may contain mixed features. A lease may follow natural expiry, but still have been informally pre-arranged. Or there may be new negotiations, but within a framework strongly shaped by the earlier lease.

Second, “single scheme or arrangement” is also factual. Separate documents and separate completion dates do not necessarily prevent linkage if the leases were in reality agreed as one bargain. Equally, transactions happening close together are not automatically one arrangement.

Third, the source distinguishes between transactions that are linked and transactions that are treated as successive linked leases. Those are not always the same category. A transaction can be linked, but specifically excluded from the successive-lease treatment and taxed under the general linked rules instead.

Finally, the source refers to agreements for lease, substantial performance, pre-SDLT transactions, and deemed lease grants. Those points sit within wider SDLT rules. If one of those features is present, it is important not to assume the ordinary renewal analysis is enough.

Key takeaways

• For SDLT, leases can be linked in different ways, and the tax treatment depends on which kind of linkage applies.
• Successive leases usually involve the same premises, the same or connected parties, and one lease taking effect immediately after another.
• A lease renewal may not be linked if it was genuinely renegotiated at arm’s length and that can be evidenced.
• Some linked transactions are specifically excluded from the successive-lease rules and are taxed under the general linked-lease provisions instead.
• Where leases of different properties are negotiated as one overall bargain, their consideration may be aggregated for SDLT purposes.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Overview of Linked Leases and Stamp Duty Land Tax Treatment

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here