Leases Continuing by Tacit Relocation After Initial Fixed Term

SDLT when a lease continues by tacit relocation

Stamp Duty Land Tax can still be relevant when a lease carries on automatically after its fixed term under tacit relocation, rather than ending on the date stated in the lease. The key issue is whether the lease has legally continued under the same arrangement or whether a new lease or other taxable event has arisen, so the original expiry date should not be treated as the end of the SDLT analysis without checking the governing law and what actually happened.

• SDLT on leases depends partly on the length of the lease term, so an automatic continuation can affect the tax position.
• Tacit relocation is mainly a Scots law concept where a lease may continue automatically if neither party properly ends it.
• You need to check whether the lease really ended at the fixed expiry date or continued by operation of law.
• The tax result may differ depending on whether the continuation is treated as part of the same lease or as a new legal arrangement.
• In practice, conveyancers and taxpayers should review the governing property law, termination steps taken, and any possible later SDLT consequences.
• HMRC guidance shows this is a recognised SDLT issue, but the final position must be based on the legislation and the full legal facts.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT and tacit relocation: what happens when a lease continues after its fixed term

This page explains how Stamp Duty Land Tax can apply where a lease does not simply end when its original fixed term expires, but instead continues automatically by tacit relocation. This matters because SDLT on leases depends in part on the term of the lease, and a lease that continues beyond its stated end date can affect how that term is understood for tax purposes.

What this rule is about

For SDLT, the length of a lease is a key factor. It helps determine the tax treatment of the grant of the lease and can affect whether later events trigger further SDLT consequences.

The source material here is about leases that continue by tacit relocation after the initial fixed term. Tacit relocation is a property law concept, most commonly associated with Scots law, under which a lease may continue automatically if neither party brings it to an end in the required way.

The legal issue is straightforward in outline but important in practice: if a lease carries on after its original term because of tacit relocation, how should that continuing period be treated for SDLT purposes?

What the official source says

The official material identifies a specific SDLT issue: leases that continue by tacit relocation after the initial fixed term. Although the extract provided is only a contents heading rather than the substantive text, the heading shows that HMRC treats this as a distinct topic within its guidance on the term of a lease.

That indicates that, for SDLT purposes, the continuation of a lease by tacit relocation is not ignored. It is relevant to the question of what the lease term is, or becomes, once the original fixed period has ended and the lease continues under the applicable legal rules.

What this means in practice

If a lease continues automatically after its fixed term, you should not assume that the SDLT position is frozen by reference only to the original expiry date written in the lease.

Instead, the practical question is whether the continuing occupation is legally part of the same lease continuing under a recognised rule of law, or whether something else has happened, such as a new lease being created. That distinction can matter because SDLT looks at the legal effect of the arrangement, not just the parties’ informal understanding.

In a tacit relocation situation, the continuation is generally significant because the lease has not simply ended in the ordinary sense. If the lease continues by operation of law, that may affect how the term is treated and whether there are later SDLT consequences.

For conveyancers and taxpayers, the practical point is to look beyond the stated contractual term and check whether the lease was properly terminated. If it was not, and the relevant law provides for automatic continuation, the SDLT analysis may need to reflect that continuing term.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach the issue is to ask the following questions:

• What was the original fixed term of the lease?
• What law governs the lease, and does that law recognise tacit relocation?
• Did the lease actually end at the fixed expiry date, or did it continue automatically because neither party validly terminated it?
• If it continued, was that continuation part of the existing lease under the governing law, or did the facts amount to a new lease or other fresh arrangement?
• Does the SDLT treatment depend on the continuing term being taken into account for the lease term, or on a later deemed transaction or variation?

The source heading alone does not set out the full answers to those questions, so care is needed not to go further than the material supports. But it clearly signals that tacit relocation is a recognised SDLT issue and that the continuation of the lease after the initial fixed term can matter.

Example

Illustration: A tenant has a lease for a fixed number of years. The written term expires, but neither landlord nor tenant serves the notice needed under the governing law to bring the lease to an end. The tenant stays in occupation and rent continues to be paid and accepted. If the lease is one that continues by tacit relocation, the SDLT analysis should consider that legal continuation rather than treating the lease as having simply stopped on the original end date.

The exact SDLT result will depend on the detailed rules and on whether the continuation is treated as part of the same lease or gives rise to a different chargeable event.

Why this can be difficult in practice

This area can be difficult because the tax result depends on underlying property law. A lease may look as though it has just rolled on informally, but the legal character of that continuation matters.

There can also be a gap between what the lease document says on its face and what has happened legally after the fixed term expired. Parties may assume the lease has ended because the written term has run out, when in fact it has continued automatically.

Another difficulty is that HMRC manual material is guidance, not legislation. The statutory SDLT position must always be grounded in the legislation, with the manual helping to explain HMRC’s view of how the rules apply. Where the manual heading is all that is available, it is sensible to avoid firm conclusions without the substantive text and the underlying legislative provisions.

Key takeaways

• A lease that continues by tacit relocation after its fixed term can still matter for SDLT.
• You should check the governing property law and whether the lease legally continued, rather than relying only on the original expiry date.
• The tax analysis may turn on whether the continuation is part of the same lease or amounts to a different legal arrangement.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Leases Continuing by Tacit Relocation After Initial Fixed Term

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here