Understanding Rent as Chargeable Consideration in Partnership Transfers Under Para19 Rules

SDLT on partnership transfers of leased property where the consideration includes rent

When a leasehold interest is transferred from a partnership and the special partnership rules apply, SDLT is not charged on the full rent figure in the usual way. Instead, the rent is first valued as a net present value under Schedule 5, then only a reduced proportion is taxed under paragraph 19, based on the SLP calculation.

• Paragraph 19 applies only if there is a transfer of a chargeable interest from a partnership, paragraph 18 applies, and some or all of the consideration is rent.
• In an ordinary lease case, SDLT taxes any premium separately from the rent, with rent charged on its net present value.
• In a partnership case covered by these rules, SDLT is charged only on a proportion of the rent’s net present value, not automatically on the full amount.
• The chargeable proportion of the rent is stated as (100 – SLP)%, with SLP derived from the lower proportions under paragraph 20 and partnership share rules in paragraph 21.
• Premium and rent must be kept separate: the premium is dealt with under the market value rules in paragraphs 18 and 20, while the rent is dealt with under paragraph 19 and modified Schedule 5 rules.
• The main practical difficulties are deciding whether the partnership rules apply at all and calculating SLP correctly from the facts.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

SDLT on partnership transfers of leased property: how rent is taxed under paragraph 19

This page explains a specialist SDLT rule that applies when a chargeable interest is transferred from a partnership and part of the consideration consists of rent. The rule matters because, in these cases, SDLT is not always charged in the ordinary way. Instead, a modified partnership calculation can apply to both any premium and the rent under the lease.

What this rule is about

Normally, when a lease is granted, SDLT looks separately at:

• any premium or other lump-sum consideration, and
• the rent payable over the term of the lease.

Those two elements are taxed under different parts of the SDLT rules. The rent element is usually charged by calculating the net present value of the future rent stream under Schedule 5 to Finance Act 2003.

Paragraph 19 deals with a more specific situation: a transfer of a chargeable interest from a partnership where paragraph 18 applies, and where all or part of the consideration consists of rent. In that situation, the ordinary lease rules are modified. SDLT is then charged only on a proportion of the rent element, rather than automatically on the full net present value.

What the official source says

The HMRC manual says that paragraph 19 applies where:

• there is a transfer of a chargeable interest from a partnership,
• paragraph 18 applies to that transfer, and
• the whole or part of the chargeable consideration consists of rent.

The manual contrasts two positions.

First, where a lease is granted and the special partnership rules in Part 3 do not apply:

• Schedule 4 determines the chargeable consideration for any premium, and
• Schedule 5 determines the chargeable consideration for the rent by calculating the net present value of the future rental flow.

Second, where the special partnership rules in Part 3 do apply:

• a proportion of the market value of the premium is chargeable under paragraphs 18 and 20, and
• a proportion of the net present value of the rent is also chargeable.

The manual states that the net present value of the rent is still worked out under Schedule 5, but Schedule 5 is applied with the amendments made by paragraph 19(2).

The proportion of the net present value that is chargeable is stated to be (100 – SLP)% under paragraph 19(2D). Here, SLP means the sum of the lower proportions calculated under paragraph 20, and the relevant partnership share is determined under paragraph 21.

What this means in practice

The practical point is that, in a partnership case covered by these rules, you do not simply tax the lease rent in the normal way on its full net present value.

Instead, the analysis has two stages:

1. Work out the rent element in the usual technical way by calculating its net present value under Schedule 5.
2. Then reduce that amount so that SDLT applies only to the proportion required by paragraph 19.

The same broad approach applies to any premium, but the manual makes clear that the premium and the rent are not governed by exactly the same charging provisions. The premium is dealt with through the market value rule in paragraphs 18 and 20. The rent is dealt with through a modified Schedule 5 calculation and then reduced by the paragraph 19 fraction.

This matters because the partnership rules are designed to prevent SDLT being charged on the part of the transaction that effectively reflects existing partnership interests. The reduction by reference to SLP is the mechanism that removes the non-chargeable proportion.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to approach this issue is to ask the following questions in order.

1. Is this a partnership transfer case at all?

You first need to establish whether the transaction is a transfer of a chargeable interest from a partnership and whether paragraph 18 applies. If not, paragraph 19 does not apply, and the ordinary lease rules apply instead.

2. Does the consideration include rent?

Paragraph 19 is only relevant where all or part of the chargeable consideration consists of rent. If the transaction involves only a premium and no rent, this specific rule on rent is not doing any work, even though other partnership rules may still matter.

3. What is the net present value of the rent?

The starting point is still the Schedule 5 calculation of the future rental flow. So the rent must first be valued using the normal net present value framework, subject to the modifications required by paragraph 19(2).

4. What is the chargeable proportion?

Once the net present value has been calculated, only a proportion is chargeable. The manual gives that proportion as (100 – SLP)%.

That means:

• if SLP is high, the chargeable proportion is reduced, and
• if SLP is low, more of the rent element remains chargeable.

To determine SLP, you must look to the lower proportions calculated under paragraph 20, using the partnership share rules in paragraph 21.

5. Have premium and rent been kept separate?

In practice, it is important not to collapse the premium and rent into one figure. The source material treats them separately:

• premium: a proportion of market value is chargeable under paragraphs 18 and 20;
• rent: a proportion of the net present value is chargeable under paragraph 19.

That distinction can affect the SDLT computation.

Example

This is only an illustration of the mechanism described in the source.

Assume a lease is granted in circumstances where paragraph 18 applies. The consideration includes:

• a premium, and
• annual rent over the term.

The rent is first converted into a net present value under Schedule 5. Suppose that figure is £200,000. If the relevant SLP figure is 60, the chargeable proportion of the rent is (100 – 60)% = 40%.

On that basis, SDLT is charged on £80,000 of the rent element, not on the full £200,000.

The premium is then considered separately under the partnership market value rules referred to in paragraphs 18 and 20.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The difficult part is usually not the idea that only part of the rent is chargeable. The difficulty is working out whether the special partnership rules apply at all, and then calculating SLP correctly.

That is fact-sensitive because SLP depends on the lower proportions under paragraph 20 and on partnership shares determined under paragraph 21. Those concepts can require close analysis of the ownership and partnership position before and after the transaction.

Another practical source of error is assuming that rent should always be taxed in full under the ordinary lease rules. That is not correct if paragraph 19 applies. Equally, it would be wrong to assume that the entire rent element is ignored. The source material says only a proportion is relieved from charge; the balance remains taxable.

Care is also needed because the source is a manual explanation, not the legislation itself. The manual points you to the relevant statutory provisions, but the actual computation depends on the terms of Schedule 5 and paragraphs 18 to 21 of Schedule 15.

Key takeaways

• Paragraph 19 applies where a chargeable interest is transferred from a partnership, paragraph 18 applies, and the consideration includes rent.
• In these cases, the rent is not simply taxed in full under the ordinary lease rules; SDLT applies to a proportion of its net present value.
• The chargeable proportion is (100 – SLP)%, and SLP must be worked out using the lower proportions under paragraph 20 and the partnership share rules in paragraph 21.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Understanding Rent as Chargeable Consideration in Partnership Transfers Under Para19 Rules

View all HMRC SDLT Guidance Pages Here