Guidance on Civil Penalties for Welsh Devolved Taxes Compliance and Appeals

WRA Civil Penalties for Welsh Devolved Taxes

The Welsh Revenue Authority civil penalties regime is a general framework for dealing with failures to meet tax obligations under Welsh devolved taxes. It covers more than just late returns or late payment, and can apply to inaccuracies, record-keeping failures, missed notifications and problems during investigations. Penalties may be fixed, charged daily or linked to the tax involved, with some scope for suspension, waiver, review or appeal depending on the rules.

• The regime is designed to encourage compliance and deter non-compliance across Welsh devolved taxes.
• Penalties can apply for late filing, late payment, inaccurate returns, poor record-keeping, failure to notify tax shortfalls and failures during investigations.
• The amount of a penalty may be a fixed sum, a daily charge or based on the amount of tax at stake.
• Some penalties may be suspended or waived, but only where the legislation allows this for that particular penalty.
• Taxpayers may be able to reduce or challenge penalties through reasonable excuse, disclosure, special circumstances, review and appeal rights.
• A civil penalty cannot be charged if the taxpayer has already been criminally convicted for the same conduct.

Scroll down for the full analysis.

WRA civil penalties for devolved taxes: overview of the regime

This page explains the general civil penalties framework used by the Welsh Revenue Authority for devolved taxes. In simple terms, it is about how the WRA encourages compliance, checks whether taxpayers have met their obligations, and imposes penalties where they have not. It also explains the broad safeguards built into the system, including review and appeal rights, and the rule against being penalised twice for the same conduct through both civil and criminal routes.

What this rule is about

The source material is an introduction to the penalties regime under the Tax Collection and Management (Wales) Act, mainly in Part 5 of that Act. It is not setting out one single penalty. Instead, it introduces the overall framework for civil penalties that can apply across Welsh devolved taxes.

The core policy aim is clear. The WRA says most taxpayers want to comply. The penalties regime is therefore designed both to support the proper operation of the taxes and to deter the minority who do not meet their obligations. The regime sits alongside the WRA’s wider powers to check returns, investigate compliance, and collect tax.

This matters because a taxpayer’s exposure is not limited to the tax itself. Depending on what has gone wrong, there may also be fixed penalties, daily penalties, or penalties linked to the amount of tax involved.

What the official source says

The official material says that the WRA has powers to help ensure taxpayers pay the right amount of tax at the right time and comply with their obligations. To encourage compliance and deter non-compliance, the legislation provides for a range of civil penalties.

According to the source, those penalties can take different forms:

• fixed amount penalties
• daily penalties
• tax-geared penalties, where the amount is linked to the tax position

The source also says that, in some circumstances and for some penalties, the WRA may suspend or waive a penalty. That does not mean every penalty can be suspended or waived. The power depends on the particular type of penalty and the conditions laid down by the legislation.

The guidance section introduced by this page covers the wider penalties regime, including rules on:

• failure to make a tax return
• failure to pay tax
• failure to notify an under-assessment or under-determination
• record-keeping failures
• failures connected with investigations
• inaccuracies, reasonable care, and suspension
• how penalties are determined and calculated
• reasonable excuse
• reduction for disclosure
• special circumstances
• appeals and reviews
• cases where more than one penalty may be chargeable

The source also highlights two important safeguards:

• taxpayers may request a review or appeal to the Tribunal against a penalty issued by the WRA
• a taxpayer is not liable to a civil penalty covered by this guidance if they have already been convicted of a criminal offence arising from the same conduct; the source describes this as the double jeopardy rule

What this means in practice

In practice, the penalties regime is broader than many taxpayers expect. It does not only deal with late filing or late payment. It also covers failures connected with record-keeping, inaccuracies in tax documents, failures to notify a tax shortfall, and conduct during investigations.

That means a person dealing with Welsh devolved taxes should think about compliance in stages:

• Was the return made when required?
• Was the tax paid on time?
• Was the return accurate?
• Were records kept properly?
• Was any later discovered underpayment properly notified if the law required that?
• Did the taxpayer cooperate appropriately if the WRA opened enquiries or investigations?

The source also signals that the amount of any penalty may depend on the type of failure. Some penalties are fixed. Some may accrue daily. Some depend on the amount of tax involved. So the practical impact can vary significantly depending on the behaviour and the underlying tax at stake.

Another important practical point is that penalties are not necessarily final just because the WRA has issued them. The source confirms that review and appeal rights exist. It also indicates that some penalties may be suspended or waived in the right circumstances, and that concepts such as reasonable excuse, disclosure, and special circumstances form part of the wider regime.

How to analyse it

A sensible way to analyse any possible WRA penalty is to work through the following questions.

• What obligation applied? Identify the underlying tax duty, such as filing, payment, notification, record-keeping, or cooperation during an investigation.
• What exactly went wrong? The legal consequences may differ depending on whether the issue is lateness, inaccuracy, omission, or failure to comply with an information or investigation requirement.
• What type of penalty does the legislation attach to that failure? The source makes clear that penalties may be fixed, daily, or tax-geared.
• Does the legislation allow suspension or waiver for that penalty? The source says this is only possible in certain circumstances and for certain penalties.
• Is there a recognised defence or reduction? The structure of the guidance shows that reasonable excuse, disclosure, and special circumstances may all be relevant depending on the penalty.
• Has there already been a criminal conviction for the same conduct? If so, the source says the taxpayer is not liable to the civil penalty described in the guidance.
• Should the decision be challenged? The source confirms that review and appeal rights are available.

This framework matters because penalty cases often turn on classification. Before asking how much the penalty is, it is usually necessary to identify what kind of failure the WRA says occurred and which statutory penalty regime applies to it.

Example

Illustration: a taxpayer dealing with a Welsh devolved tax submits a return late and also pays the tax late. The source material indicates that these are separate areas within the penalties regime. That means the taxpayer should not assume there is only one penalty issue. There may be one set of rules for the late return and another for the late payment. If the return also contained an inaccuracy, that could potentially raise a further and different penalty question under the inaccuracies regime.

The exact outcome would depend on the detailed rules for each penalty type, but the introduction makes clear that the regime is built to address different forms of non-compliance separately.

Why this can be difficult in practice

The introduction is high level, and that is itself part of the difficulty. It tells the reader that many different penalty regimes exist, but it does not set out the detailed tests, conditions, or calculation rules for each one. In practice, penalty disputes often depend on those details.

There are several points where care is needed:

• The fact that the WRA can suspend or waive penalties in some cases does not mean this is available across the board.
• The existence of appeal rights does not itself answer whether the penalty was correctly charged; that depends on the statutory conditions for the specific penalty.
• The double jeopardy point is narrow. The source refers to a criminal conviction arising out of the same conduct. Whether conduct is truly the same may sometimes need careful analysis.
• Where more than one failure has occurred, more than one penalty may potentially arise. The interaction between penalties can therefore be important.

So although the introduction is helpful as a map of the regime, the real legal analysis usually has to move on to the specific penalty category involved.

Key takeaways

• The WRA civil penalties regime covers a wide range of tax failures, not just late filing and late payment.
• Penalties may be fixed, daily, or linked to the amount of tax, and some may be capable of suspension or waiver depending on the legislation.
• Taxpayers have review and appeal rights, and a civil penalty cannot be imposed where there has already been a criminal conviction for the same conduct.

This page was last updated on 24 March 2026

Useful article? You may find it helpful to read the original guidance here: Guidance on Civil Penalties for Welsh Devolved Taxes Compliance and Appeals

View all WRA LTT Guidance Pages Here